Oh, that is RICH!!!! Hoo hah! If only this actually wound up in court we'd have the most sensational trial since OJ. I have a feeling CBS will settle out of court though. Because their investigators have proven nothing, it's all conjecture and they know it. However, if they are brave enough they'll fight it in court anyhow and I'll tell you why they should:
(Is everybody listening????)
While BDI can't be proven, IDI most certainly CAN be disproven. And if CBS's lawyers aren't sure, they should consult this blog.
The CBS strategy should be to begin by going after Lou Smit and his precious intruder, and what they would need to emphasize is the LOGIC rather than the evidence. Because once you get stuck on the evidence then there will be no end of red herrings to contend with. The evidence tells us nothing useful about this case because all of it is inconclusive. It's the logic that enables us to prove there could have been no intruder.
Are you listening, CBS?????
Once it's established that there could have been no intruder, Wood will fold like a sagging accordion. Because: if Burke didn't do it, and there was no intruder then . . .
I'll let you fill in the blanks, folks. This is going to be VERY amusing.Oh and by the way. I hope everyone reading here will take the time to check out 3 Big Ways 'The Case of: JonBenet Ramsey' Got It Wrong, in Rolling Stone. Very similar to my own take on that "investigation," I'm pleased to note.
NB: Since the other posts are filling up with comments, please post all new comments here. Thank you.