Newcomers to this blog are advised to begin with the first two posts, Just the Facts, Ma'am and Case Solved, which explain in very general terms why I believe I've solved this case. Some important questions are answered in the following post, Misunderstandings, Misconceptions, Misdirections. After that feel free to browse whatever topics might interest you (see blog archive).
NB: If anyone has trouble posting a comment, email it to doktorgosh (at) live.com, and I'll post it for you.
Notice to readers of my Kindle book:I recently noticed that, on certain devices (though not all), the Table of Contents begins with Chapter One and omits the Introduction and Preface. Since the Introduction is especially important, I urge everyone to make sure to begin reading at the very beginning of the book, not the first chapter in the Table of Contents. Thank you.
Wednesday, August 28, 2019
New Thread
Time for a new thread, I've been told. (What's wrong with the old one, if I may ask?)
Not a thing, but in the past you have typically started a new thread when the old one gets up around 200 comments, as newcomers don't always know to press "Load more", and it can be cumbersome for those of us who post only on their cell phones.
Sorry, Doc, it was my email suggestion, made as I know you're busy and don't always have time to check this blog.
The clique of women who post in the JonBenet Facebook groups are freaky. They spend all day mocking, ridiculing and spewing venom at a 9 yr. old kid. Anyone who disagrees with the admin gets kicked out. They all have mad crushes on Jim Kolar and are in love with him. They think they're brilliant but they take all of their talking points from the anti-Burke, Juror13 website.
What's hilarious is that the one who's running the whole thing posts here under multiple aliases but goes around accusing anyone who disagrees with her on FB of being an alt and bans them.
The level of hatred that is being heaped on one little boy is actually worse than the way Patsy was talked about back when everyone was PDI and the discussion forums existed mostly just to tear her apart and mock her. The BDI craze is proof of that we're a child hating culture. We hate kids more than we hate women. I don't think people care about JonBenet or if they do it's because she's perfect because she's dead.
Every couple of months someone posts the video of the funeral procession on Reddit and everyone there unleashes their hatred on and tears down Burke because they caught him smiling nervously. He's 9. And then there are the police interview videos. A stressed little kid is ripped to shreds by the crowds because he fidgeted, failed at recognizing pineapple, isn't crying and drew an incomplete crayon portrait.
Someone on Reddit recently stabbed herself to prove the train-track theory. She claims to have had email correspondences with the almighty Kolar. She lives to prove to other people that a little boy murdered JonBenet and then violated her corpse. She's actually generally a nice person and I am concerned for her mental health.
While I don't agree that we're a child hating society, a rant about Burke's treatment is entirely justifiable.
How do you know this admin of whom you speak posts here? Can you identify her for us? Have you posted my JBR Encyclopedia quote of 7/20 on her FB group, and asked why Hunter, Kane and Beckner all exonerated Burke?
I recognize the posting style. She goes by Lou here. I think she called herself dink at one point. On FB they say that authorities only pretended to clear Burke because he was a minor. I didn't know you had a quote in the JBR encyclopedia. I'll go check that out.
Even StrayDog on Reddit who is actually intelligent and who is currently monopolizing most of the conversations there, is positive the grand jury thought a 3rd party was involved. She claims that it is legally impossible to come to any other conclusion and that it must've been a "runaway jury". She says it was an investigative grand jury and that in Colorado, grand juries can call their own witnesses and launch their own investigation and that that is what happened and they came to the conclusion that it was Burke. I think she got this idea from a former commenter who was a law student who did a rather long pinned post about it.
Check Doc's prior thread, "Neverending Story", at 7/20 for my quote from the Encyclopedia. In fact, read the entire thread for Doc's and my refutations of Burke's involvement.
"Dink" is my pet name for a character known here as Inquisitive, Lou, Castor, or sometimes Anonymous. To understand the history you'd have to go back in Doc's archives to September of 2016.
Thanks for your information, and your interest in the truth.
Well damn, what a rant. I take it you didn't read the link. There are numerous references listed at the bottom of her entry. Medical citations, etc. I don't know anything about a Facebook group, and I'm not registered at reddit either. I don't see the "hate" for children there, nor with Burke in particular. If you're so miserable at any site, click out and do something that adds joy. You either light it up, or diffuse it.
I don't think Anonymous is giving an accurate portrayal of what the Reddit community is about. Here is a summary of the 5 most recent discussion posts there: (1) a refutation of some Ramsey nonsense about the DNA "evidence", (2) debate about whether it's plausible or probable that a child would commit sexual assault, (3) a detailed exploration of the "train track theory", (4) a discussion about why John Ramsey was apologizing to friends after the murder, (5) a discussion about what John Ramsey may have got up to during the time he "disappeared" on the 26th.
In all those discussions, many differing views are presented. You guys, with your personal experience and knowledge of the case, would be welcome contributors to these discussions.
It is certainly not about "child hating" or leading a lynch mob against Burke.
From Lawrence Schiller's book, "Perfect Murder, Perfect Town":
"Around 7:00 P.M. John Ramsey went for a walk with John Fernie and Dr. Francesco Beuf, JonBenét’s physician, who had brought over some medication for Patsy. When they returned a half hour later, Ramsey asked Bynum to represent him. “I’m sorry, I’m so sorry,” Ramsey told his friends over and over. Then, just after 8:00, he left alone to take a walk in the nearby foothills."
If you have some evidence that contradicts Schiller's account of that evening, I would again suggest that you make a Reddit account and add a comment to the discussion post. I am sure people would be fascinated to see your evidence.
There is of course a recycling of topics on Reddit, as on any cold case discussion forum--but since that site has a large and constantly changing userbase, even the old questions usually prompt new and thought-provoking discussions.
I suppose people discuss this case for different reasons. Some seek nothing more than approval from those they agree with/idolize. Others seek to have their ideas challenged.
Is this the stray dog from reddit?! I'm just now reading up on new entries there, and noticed the nic with the "self -published book" moniker. Just have to say you rock! I always enjoy reading straydog77's entries. (and several others too)
Thanks, K. It's going to be a bad one, and right now the models are predicting a direct hit. We were without power for five days after Irma, so if I disappear for a week or so, that's the likely cause.
You betcha', T. They think it'll hit full force Monday, possibly as a Category 5, though there's a slim chance of a cold front pushing it a little offshore Sunday. The next two days will tell the tale.
The infamous 12/26/96 morning photo of the hallway leading to the wine cellar shows the golf clubs leaning against the wall in the right foreground.
The energetic followers of this mystery recall John Ramsey's request of Patsy's sister (Pam?) to retrieve his golf bag when she was allowed by Boulder police to remove personal items from the house in the days following the murder.
Like others presumably, this writer assumed Ramsey was requesting the retrieval of the small bag with the golf clubs in it (country club golfers often keep both a lighter "carrying bag" and a larger, much heavier and expensive, "cart bag" with their name shown on it, like a professional) shown in the right foreground of the hallway photo.
If you look at the photo very closely, a large golf bag (probably dark brown leather and vinyl), sans any visible golf clubs, looms in the background on the left side in the upper portion of the photo, closer to the wine cellar door, and appears to have John Ramsey's name stitched into the front of it.
Since Ramsey was quoted as wanting his "golf bag" retrieved, with no mention of golf "clubs" that this writer can recall (without researching it at the moment), the writer surmises that the large leather monogrammed bag is the one that Ramsey wanted retrieved.
After looking further there isn't much to make of it, as in June 1998 with Kane and Smit (excerpted below), John addresses his big monogrammed [purple, not brown] golf bag, and strongly denies (truthfully it appears) having mentioned anything about "getting his golf clubs" (before the funeral).
In the third hand recounting by someone earlier in 1998 who supposedly had overheard his asking before the funeral whether or not his "golf bag" had been retrieved, the clubs aren't even mentioned in that person's recounting. People seemed to miss the distinction between a bag and clubs, perhaps because a golf club was so focused on as being a possible murder weapon.
Regardless, as to physical evidentiary value: Pam was not allowed in the basement at all, so it is likely that police went through both the big bag and little bag during their investigations.
"June 1998 John Ramsey Interrogation by Lou Smit and Mike Kane (Golf Clubs and Golfing)
0276 14 JOHN RAMSEY: Well, it's obviously been 15 moved around some. This bag has been moved, looks 16 like. 17 MIKE KANE: Which one are you referring to? 18 JOHN RAMSEY: A purple bag with my name on 19 it. 20 MIKE KANE: From where to where? 21 JOHN RAMSEY: Well, it looks like it's been 22 moved down off the pile, because it's usually 23 here. This laundry basket doesn't show in here. 24 LOU SMIT: So it looks like something has 25 been moved between the time this picture was taken
0277 1 and this picture was taken? 2 JOHN RAMSEY: It looks like this cane 3 has been moved. It's hard to tell from the 4 picture. 5 LOU SMIT: (INAUDIBLE) 6 JOHN RAMSEY: It looks like those little 7 marks 8 are right on the heel in the back hallway.
(SNIP)
0642 20 MIKE KANE: Do you remember the day 21 after this happened, being on the phone talking 22 to someone about getting your golf clubs? 23 JOHN RAMSEY: No. Absolutely not."
Obviously Kane appeared to be interested, as he asked the above question in the June 1998 interview, though addressing the question with respect to golf clubs not the bag.
Aside from the the clubs versus bag loophole, if Mrs. Fernie's supposed recounting in January 1998 was accurate, the common sense speculation was why a man who had just lost his daughter would care anything at all about whether his golf bag had been retrieved from the house.
Not the bag in the hallway photo with clubs in it, but a much larger bag near the wine cellar door it appears from the context. (the photo showing the hallway leading to the wine cellar door was taken before JonBenet's body was discovered according to Smit in the transcript of the June 1998 interviews, and during the investigation both golf bags were moved, of course, such that a later photo following the search warrant showed both bags in a different place, leading to an irrelevant, it seems, or at least highly confusing, back and forth between John and the interviewers in 1998 about the large bag having been moved).
Below is from Kolar's book Foreign Faction (in the passage about Mrs. Fernie's contacting investigators in January 1998 with her recollection about the bag, seemingly being the basis for Kane's above question posed to Ramsey in June 1998):
"Mrs. Fernie recalled that John Ramsey had asked a strange question of the person stopping by her home one evening: He asked if they had remembered to “get his golf bag” from his house. Mrs. Fernie recalled that the individual replied that they had not been able to retrieve the bag, as the police would not let them downstairs."
Kolar, A. James. Foreign Faction: Who Really Kidnapped JonBenet? (p. 326). Ventus Publishing, llc. Kindle Edition.
Posted on reddit earlier tonight, I haven't listened to it yet. Australian Podcast Interview with John Ramsey from 2016.
Link is by user -
"AdequateSizeAttache -
For those who like analyzing John Ramsey's statements, a nearly hour long interview from October 2016 on Australian podcast Nitty Gritty Committee. Recounts, addresses, and answers a bunch of stuff"
This interview was done after Burke's Dr. Phil interview and the CBS presentation. Within about 4 years of Jonbenet's murder, tabloids start running stories of BDI, as John mentioned that they sued the tabloids about 4 or five times beginning in 2000-2001 on behalf of Burke when he was 12, "or 13,14".
He said that Burke being on the autism spectrum is "nonsense".
A few things I forgot/didn't know-
They had 24 hour police protection for one year.
That a judge in Atlanta (I believe he said a federal judge) reviewed the case.
A reddit discussion about the ransom note's apparent location made me realize a significant problem with DocG's theory. The most logical place for the note was Jonbenet's bed; that could have bought time, since no one would have been alerted to her disappearance until she was otherwise checked on. In DocG's scenario, time was paramount for John, and this point did indeed end up working against him. On the other hand, an intruder might not want to risk going back upstairs, and might not be too worried about what happens after he leaves. If it was Patsy, she clearly wasn't worried about time, since she "found" the note and alerted others to it. But at least in DocG's scenario, John would have had every reason to place the note on Jonbenet's bed and hope that Patsy didn't check on her too early. DocG's theory did seem more plausible than the popular RDI scenarios, but this is a significant flaw.
Sorry, but I don't see the flaw. Why would John care if Patsy found the note "too early"? The position of the note actually casts suspicion on John because it would only have been put on that staircase by someone who knew her early morning habits.
I suppose this is a futile discussion. Some have argued that the note's apparent location points to an intruder, since Jonbenet's bed would have been the obvious place for it until one considers practical issues an intruder would have faced. But of course a Ramsey could have realized that. Still, in your theory, it seems like John would have wanted to delay Patsy as much as possible. Yes, he might have wanted Patsy to find the note, but it's hard to believe that he intended to be in the shower when that happened.
He knew Patsy well enough to know that she'd never take an action of that sort without consulting with him first. I'm not sure what your problem is. Coulda shoulda woulda are purely speculative. I've been concentrated essentially on the facts and logic of the case.
While watching this Overkill program, that I prerecorded, I saw in one of the evidence photo, a new lead, that will solve this case, it startled me, what I saw in one of the evidence photo of Jon benet. My dilemma is who to trust & contact with this new lead that puts all the puzzle into place!
I do think the reason they're keeping Joe in the basement is because every time he opens his mouth, he stumbles and loses his train of thought. It's really sad to watch and I agree with Paul that the Dems are petrified about Joe being able to beat Trump and/or even make it to and through the election.
Don't trust the polls, CC. Remember 2016? Hillary was ahead all the way up until she lost. It's a big country out there and the silent majority once again, is watching.
Don't count those chickens, CC. People in this country don't like what they see happening. Riots, looting, killing, radical groups taking over streets in a major city. You can't go out of your houses or open your businesses, but you can pack city streets by the hundreds of thousands and no mention of Covid anywhere by any mayor or governor of those cities EXCEPT when there is a Trump rally. There is a double standard and major hypocrisy going on.
This is about fairness and law and order. It's about right and wrong. Trump doesn't have all the answers, and there are moments I want to smack him myself, HOWEVER, he stands a better chance of winning than Biden. Trump is a much stronger candidate in every way.
I have a feeling you are going to be very disappointed on Nov 4th, 2020.
Trump is a proven crook, liar and sexual predator, all things you abhor.
I get that you live in the most diverse city in the country, and you blame the city's problems on that very racial and ethnic diversity, but white supremacy isn't the answer. Violence isn't the answer.
Nor is Trump.
Move. Come down here. It's past time you got out of the City.
Defend thugs Encourage mass protests during a pandemic Disparage Trump voters and rally attendees Arrest business owners who are trying to make a living Allow arsonists, looters and murderers to "Vent" Allow vandalism and the removal of statues without arresting the lawbreakers
THEY LOSE! The American people are watching, very closely. This is what we call in the business a NIGO - Not In Good Order and in face, total Out of Order.
In March, 65 percent of Republicans viewed Trump’s job performance with strong approval. In June, that dropped to 57 percent, a decline of eight points. The percentage of Republicans who said they somewhat approved of Trump’s performance increased by about four points, meaning a four-point decline overall.
There was a flotilla of 1000 boats in Jacksonville to celebrate his birthday. Also, he's gotten over a million people to register for his rally in Oklahoma. Just doesn't support your assertions. Psychopath.
There's nothing impartial about Reuters. It is leftist propaganda and your "facts" are leftist propaganda. And if your source is Reuters what's point in citing sources? I'll answer for you, propaganda.
Same source as Reuters. Reuters is leftists doing poll. Trump is conservatives doing poll. Both have the same credibility. You're silly to cite polls. I'll cite them back at you.
CC...You're better than that yourself. Your hatred for DT is blinding your good judgement. Biden will be the President in name only, and at that, only for a short time. He is being pushed far left and that together with him being on the fast track to senility will cause his defeat. People want law and order, justice and fairness. Right now we have mobs of people controlling the narrative and that cannot stand. This isn't mob rule, we have a criminal justice system that works. The dems with their identity politics are killing this country. Everyone is offended, history is being dismantled before our eyes, streets being overtaken, stores looted, burned to the ground, innocent people being killed and on and on and on. If you want more of THAT kind of America, then you go right ahead and vote for Biden.
No, Dems are solely responsible for any racism. They're the party of slavery, the Klan and Jim Crow. Who did Lincoln call the "Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse"? Hint, hint-they weren't Republicans.
Nope. Straight up, truthful, with no political agenda other than to help bring down the crook, liar and sexual predator currently occupying the White House.
As ever, plug any of my statements into any browser, check my veracity.
So, your alternative to Trump is non-stop violence? All day temper tantrums and destroying businesses? Yes, I think most Americans are going to vote for that. It will be interesting to watch the contrast between the law abiding citizens inside at Trump's rally and the immature anarchists destroying things outside.
Asked, but not answered. Here, I'll give you a hand:
Your source was Trump, who's lied to the American populace more than 18,000 times. Not a good source.
"Likely voters"? What are those, exactly?
Billy B's attempt to dump the attorney for the SDNY just failed miserably, as did his attempt to save Flynn. You support a bunch of crooks, losers and racists.
Trump's approval rating is in the toilet.
Biden leads him by 8-14 points in every poll in every swing state.
Your dear leader is going down, sMarms, you ineffectual, impotent little man.
Hey Goofball, You're such a lying propagandist. How would I assure there would be "a million" if the stadium only holds 19K? I said 1 million registered. I registered. There was no way I was going to go.
You never answer any questions but just spew propaganda and talking points so I don't expect you to answer this. But, can you tell me what Joe Biden meant when speaking at Robert Byrd's eulogy he said Senator Byrd spoke "truth to power." What did he mean by that?
I don't blame the Democrats for trying to rewrite history. They're the party of slavery, Trail of Tears, the KKK, Jim Crow, Japanese American internment, and The Great Society.
Constance, were you in Lincoln Park today with your comrades? You had a tough time trying to tear down that Jackson statue. Too bad the police arrived. Was that you shouting insults at them?
104 wounded and 14 dead in one day in Chicago. NYC, 24 shot in one day. 30% increase in murder in NYC this year. De Blasio disbanded the city's anti-crime unit. In Seattle, a 19 year old was murdered in CHAZ. Minneapolis, one dead and 11 injured. NC, two dead, seven wounded. And, on and on. Weekend of violence. The good citizens of America need to take up arms and stop this. The government has acquiesced to the thugs.
The US posted a record number of new coronavirus cases yesterday, the death toll topped 125,000, the epidemic is surging in swing states Trump desperately needs but is already losing, 40 million are unemployed, we're in a recession, yet he continues to lie and deny.
Trump said he's "flattened the curve", he rails against wearing masks, he's planning more rallies in enclosed spaces without social distancing, and yesterday he directed the withdrawal of Federal funding for testing sites.
All his attempts to distract, like yapping about lobsters and statues are failing as miserably as he is.
The US is at the epicenter of the pandemic, worldwide, so Trump finally got his wish:
It is not about Trump. It has never been about Trump. You leftists hate this country and all for which it stands, the institutions, the history, the culture. CHAZ or CHOP is your leftist utopia. Why don't you move there, Constance? You'd be much happier.
If Biden wins you believe your leftist utopia will come to be. Nope. The Republic will be over, but your leftist utopia will not happen. Here where I live and many other places already have our utopia. The leftists tried to come here but we threw them out. We are armed. We can defend ourselves. We can grow food and take care of ourselves. You and your ilk are going to have problems. I wonder if you'll keep your federal pension? Good luck.
OK, so you said you husband was a former FBI, prosecutor and federal judge. That usually comes with a federal pension.
Nope. Never been a racist. Neither is Trump. The racists are on the left. The Democrats, KKK, Jim Crow, Nazis, Fascists, Marxists are all leftists. Those are the racists, not conservatives. You keep getting it wrong. That is a typical leftist tactic. Accuse your opponent of what you are.
Trump has tried to keep us out of a recession but the media and your leftist brethren have done everything they could to hinder the recovery and exacerbate a recession. Well, I think they might get much more than what they wanted. No one but an absolute retard blames this economy on Trump.
Here's all the math anyone needs to understand right now:
Trump is losing, country-wide and in every state, by 10 points in the poll averaging.
He knows it, too. He told Hannity on Thursday night that Biden will be the next president. The only person who doesn't get it is you, which makes you not only blindingly stupid but a
Seriously disturbed? So, you wanted a psychopath like yourself to win? Someone who solicited foreign interference in the election. Then you rooted for the Democrats to impeach Trump without an impeachable offense just because you don't like him. You supported Adam Schiff's trumped up impeachment attempt with his phony "whistleblower" and you support Pelosi, Schumer, Nadler, all psychopaths like you. Disturbed? The only one disturbed here is you, psychopath.
Oh, and by the way, I fully understand Biden could win. However, my attitude is that if America is stupid enough to put the leftists in charge then so be it. The Republic will be no more. I would hate that but could live with it. Can you? I will help start a new Republic.
Judicial Watch announced today that the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) released 80 pages of records that show top Obama White House officials scrambling to “evolve” its false claims that the September 11, 2012, terrorist attacks on U.S. Government facilities in Benghazi, Libya, began “spontaneously” in response to an anti-Muslim video on the Internet. The emails show top Obama White House official Ben Rhodes and Clinton State Department Deputy Chief of Staff Jake Sullivan joking about being called “liars” and “leakers.”.....
You must be thinking about Obama. I know it is easy for you to get confused. Let's start at the beginning....1 +1 = 2
His plea from the White House driveway to China in 2019.
He's up to his fat ass in loans from Chinese and Russian banks which he cannot repay.
And now today there's a new scandal: The Taliban, whose representatives he invited to Camp David, were paid by Russia to kill American troops in Afghanistan. Trump has known since March, yet saw fit to invite Russia back to the G7, and continues to praise Putin.
He's a proven crook, liar, sexual predator and now a traitor.
You neglected to mention Trump's four recent, resounding losses in the Supremes and two lower courts, one of which was funding for his vanity Wall.
Trump has admitted he's losing to Biden. He's been rebuked by both Graham and Grassley, who are quickly backing away from him.
One of his own advisors yesterday predicted the most stunning electoral college loss in political history.
That's a lot of losing in a week.
As the epidemic and the economy continue to worsen, so will his numbers. He's all about perception, sees himself as a winner; this must be a tremendous blow to his fragile ego.
I can't help but wonder if he'll resign, head off to Qatar where there's no extradition and he has one of his cheesy properties, to avoid prosecution by the SDNY and the State of New York.
You are comical. You believe there will be healing? So, you leftists will stop your temper tantrums after you win? And, you think everyone will be happy? And, you think that is healing because you've stopped your temper tantrums. There will be no healing. You've shown yourselves. We don't want to live with you or your ideals. If Biden wins the Republic is over. Also, nothing will happen to Trump. He will have to flee nowhere. And, if you think Biden will win because your polls are telling you that then you're even more delusional than I thought. If Trump loses it won't be because of polls.
Also, you think if Trump loses everything will be hunky dory? Do you think BLM and Antifa will stop? You think you'll be able to control your thugs at that point? You are a moron. They will come for you.
His base comprises 25-30% of the electorate, not enough to get him elected. He needs the Independents and disaffected Dems who dragged him across the line last time, and he's lost them, just as he's lost women, Blacks, Hispanics and the over-60 set.
He's got nothing but his diminishing cult.
Of course he'll be prosecuted once out of office, at both the state and federal level. Tax fraud, bank fraud, as well as criminal charges in the University and Foundation cases.
Yeah, I think once the Racist-in-Chief is out the protests will abate.
No one is coming for me, you fear-mongering, gun-toting, impotent idiot, any more than anyone is coming for you.
". . . Socially irresponsible behavior; disregarding or violating the rights of others;inability to distinguish between right and wrong;difficulty with showing remorse or empathy; tendency to lie often; manipulating and hurting others; recurring problems with the law; general disregard towards safety and responsibility."
Nothing there describes me. Nothing.
I merely disagree with you and hate your hero and what he's done to this country.
No thanks; I'm non-violent and, unlike you, not a wacko reactionary.
But ooooh! Maybe that'll help you get it up tonight!!!
Went right over your head, didn't it? CNN is admitting now that hydroxychloroquine and zinc works, just not better than anything else, like Remdesivir. I never said it worked better than Remdesivir or antibody therapy. I just said it worked. You're the one who said it didn't work and was dangerous. I know logic is a difficult concept for you but can you at least try? Again, 1+1=2.
Did Trump have something to do with Louisiana's anti-abortion law? Trump has always wrongly supported baby killing. It is something you two have in common.
We now have evidence that Hunter Biden made 5 trips to China while his Daddy was VP. Of course, Uncle Joe doesn't know anything about that. Just like he didn't know anything about the Flynn case. Or did he just forget? He's forgetting everything. I wonder if he remembers that he is running for President?
HHS has purchased all of Gilead's supply of Remdesivir at $3200 per treatment. This is one million treatments at over three billion dollars. It is instead of buying one million doses of hydroxychloroquine and zinc at $50 per treatment. This makes Doctor Fauci and Constance happy.
"Post your proof of hydroxychloroquine's efficacy." Wow, you sound so scientific and erudite. Funny, coming from someone with your math skills. There's no such thing as proof in science. I've explained that to you. But you don't get math. There is a lot of evidence, however. Go look for it.
Trump changed his pro-choice stance immediately after his inauguration with the "Gag Rule" and then declaring that women who undergo abortions should be "punished". So yeah, he had a stake in today's Supreme Court loss.
Ivanka has 18 trademarks issued by China during daddy's presidency, and owns factories there.
Since Trump is inherently stupid, is having trouble walking, drinking water and speaking in coherent sentences, I'd be careful.
Ivanka actually runs a business. She hasn't received payoffs because of who here Daddy is. In Ukraine, Biden withheld funding to stop prosecution of Burisma. In China, Hunter brought back over a billion dollars of "investment". So, you say Ivanka got "trademarks?" So what? Her clothing line was shuttered.
Did you see the video? Is a video proof? What other proof do you need? I know proof is a difficult concept for you. Show proof she got the deals because of her father.
Real doctors, in the field, are using it to treat their patients. That's all the "evidence" I need. Don't need an FDA "efficacy." Gee, you're so smart with your big words.
Since both the FDA and the American College of Physicians have warned against the use of hydroxychloroquine as treatment for coronavirus, that's doubtful.
That warning was based on faulty data used by the Lancet "study." Doctors don't need an efficacy study to administer medicine. Hydroxychloroquine is safe and been used for decades to treat malaria and lupus. Also, the evidence isn't anecdotal. You and Dr. Fauci need to learn the meaning of anecdotal. These are medical professionals scientifically administering medication to their patients and recordings dosages, effects and results. This isn't anecdotal. I know it is natural for you to acquiesce to the authority of the Federal Government but real medical professionals don't need Fauci, the CDC, or the FDA to treat their patients.
Yup. If you paid attention to the Lancet study you'd have seen they picked the highest risk categories to report their findings. It was all designed as a political stunt instead of anything scientific. Independent thinking? You're a leftist drone who repeats talking points.
They knew what kind of data it was and they published it anyway. They hoped no one would notice. They seriously damaged their reputations with their political idiocy.
No there aren't. None of those studies used hydroxychloroquine with zinc supplement. They were all false studies. There are real doctors in France prescribing hydroxychloroqine and zinc with positive results. As I've explained to you it is the zinc that kills the virus. It acts just like Remdesivir on the virus replicase. You mean Trump's latest Russia fake news? Here you go again with your marching orders and talking points.
The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine study cherry picked their data from the 4th quartile, the most high risk group. Do you want me to explain it to you?
Sure thing, sMarmy . . . "it is the zinc". The shit is dangerous, it doesn't work and you've no verifiable proof that it does.
It's not fake news.
Not only is it real, it's already losing Trump vets and the military.
He's got nothing left but his cult, and even that's slipping in the face of 127,000 dead, 40M unemployed, a resurging epidemic and the worst economy since the Depression.
Did you know that Surgisphere refused to provide their full data used in the retrospective study published by Lancet and the NEJM for independent review?
Did you know the NYT story about Trump being briefed about the GRU offering Taliban fighters bounties on US soldiers was fake news? Did you know that? Or, were you intentionally or ignorantly spewing leftist propaganda?
Is that one of your 19,000 lies that Trump has told? Why don't we go through the 19,000 lies one by one and show us your proof of each lie. Let's start with lie #1.
It is fake news. The intelligence community assessed that the information was suspect so they didn't brief Trump. This is according to the Washington Examiner. Who has more credibility the Washington Examiner or the NYT?
Not a thing, but in the past you have typically started a new thread when the old one gets up around 200 comments, as newcomers don't always know to press "Load more", and it can be cumbersome for those of us who post only on their cell phones.
ReplyDeleteSorry, Doc, it was my email suggestion, made as I know you're busy and don't always have time to check this blog.
Wow, this reddit thread is so in depth on the marks found on JonBenet's back.
ReplyDeleteVery lengthy read. But very informative.
Note: please do not replicate this experiment on any living thing. The thread starter did several experiments on herself with photos.
https://www.reddit.com/r/JonBenetRamsey/comments/cwqhkt/kolars_train_track_theory_an_experiment_and_a/
The clique of women who post in the JonBenet Facebook groups are freaky. They spend all day mocking, ridiculing and spewing venom at a 9 yr. old kid. Anyone who disagrees with the admin gets kicked out. They all have mad crushes on Jim Kolar and are in love with him. They think they're brilliant but they take all of their talking points from the anti-Burke, Juror13 website.
ReplyDeleteWhat's hilarious is that the one who's running the whole thing posts here under multiple aliases but goes around accusing anyone who disagrees with her on FB of being an alt and bans them.
The level of hatred that is being heaped on one little boy is actually worse than the way Patsy was talked about back when everyone was PDI and the discussion forums existed mostly just to tear her apart and mock her. The BDI craze is proof of that we're a child hating culture. We hate kids more than we hate women. I don't think people care about JonBenet or if they do it's because she's perfect because she's dead.
Every couple of months someone posts the video of the funeral procession on Reddit and everyone there unleashes their hatred on and tears down Burke because they caught him smiling nervously. He's 9. And then there are the police interview videos. A stressed little kid is ripped to shreds by the crowds because he fidgeted, failed at recognizing pineapple, isn't crying and drew an incomplete crayon portrait.
Someone on Reddit recently stabbed herself to prove the train-track theory. She claims to have had email correspondences with the almighty Kolar. She lives to prove to other people that a little boy murdered JonBenet and then violated her corpse. She's actually generally a nice person and I am concerned for her mental health.
The whole thing creeps me out.
While I don't agree that we're a child hating society, a rant about Burke's treatment is entirely justifiable.
DeleteHow do you know this admin of whom you speak posts here? Can you identify her for us? Have you posted my JBR Encyclopedia quote of 7/20 on her FB group, and asked why Hunter, Kane and Beckner all exonerated Burke?
I recognize the posting style. She goes by Lou here. I think she called herself dink at one point. On FB they say that authorities only pretended to clear Burke because he was a minor. I didn't know you had a quote in the JBR encyclopedia. I'll go check that out.
DeleteEven StrayDog on Reddit who is actually intelligent and who is currently monopolizing most of the conversations there, is positive the grand jury thought a 3rd party was involved. She claims that it is legally impossible to come to any other conclusion and that it must've been a "runaway jury". She says it was an investigative grand jury and that in Colorado, grand juries can call their own witnesses and launch their own investigation and that that is what happened and they came to the conclusion that it was Burke. I think she got this idea from a former commenter who was a law student who did a rather long pinned post about it.
Check Doc's prior thread, "Neverending Story", at 7/20 for my quote from the Encyclopedia. In fact, read the entire thread for Doc's and my refutations of Burke's involvement.
Delete"Dink" is my pet name for a character known here as Inquisitive, Lou, Castor, or sometimes Anonymous. To understand the history you'd have to go back in Doc's archives to September of 2016.
Thanks for your information, and your interest in the truth.
P.S. As a former prosecutor I can assure you that no DA or member of law enforcement "pretends" to clear anyone, under any circumstances.
DeleteWell damn, what a rant. I take it you didn't read the link. There are numerous references listed at the bottom of her entry. Medical citations, etc.
ReplyDeleteI don't know anything about a Facebook group, and I'm not registered at reddit either. I don't see the "hate" for children there, nor with Burke in particular. If you're so miserable at any site, click out and do something that adds joy. You either light it up, or diffuse it.
I don't think Anonymous is giving an accurate portrayal of what the Reddit community is about. Here is a summary of the 5 most recent discussion posts there: (1) a refutation of some Ramsey nonsense about the DNA "evidence", (2) debate about whether it's plausible or probable that a child would commit sexual assault, (3) a detailed exploration of the "train track theory", (4) a discussion about why John Ramsey was apologizing to friends after the murder, (5) a discussion about what John Ramsey may have got up to during the time he "disappeared" on the 26th.
ReplyDeleteIn all those discussions, many differing views are presented. You guys, with your personal experience and knowledge of the case, would be welcome contributors to these discussions.
It is certainly not about "child hating" or leading a lynch mob against Burke.
With the exception of your (4), which is patently false, all your points have been discussed here for many years, with all opinions being welcome.
DeleteI, for one, see no reason to contribute to reddit, which I've visited several times and found facile and entirely lacking in facts and logic.
But by all means, please yourself.
From Lawrence Schiller's book, "Perfect Murder, Perfect Town":
Delete"Around 7:00 P.M. John Ramsey went for a walk with John Fernie and Dr. Francesco Beuf, JonBenét’s physician, who had brought over some medication for Patsy. When they returned a half hour later, Ramsey asked Bynum to represent him. “I’m sorry, I’m so sorry,” Ramsey told his friends over and over. Then, just after 8:00, he left alone to take a walk in the nearby foothills."
If you have some evidence that contradicts Schiller's account of that evening, I would again suggest that you make a Reddit account and add a comment to the discussion post. I am sure people would be fascinated to see your evidence.
There is of course a recycling of topics on Reddit, as on any cold case discussion forum--but since that site has a large and constantly changing userbase, even the old questions usually prompt new and thought-provoking discussions.
I suppose people discuss this case for different reasons. Some seek nothing more than approval from those they agree with/idolize. Others seek to have their ideas challenged.
Is this the stray dog from reddit?! I'm just now reading up on new entries there, and noticed the nic with the "self -published book" moniker.
DeleteJust have to say you rock! I always enjoy reading straydog77's entries. (and several others too)
Oops, should have added, if you don't want to reveal your nics from other forums, that's cool.
DeleteCC(and anyone in southeast U.S.)
ReplyDeleteI hope this storm remains offshore. Stay safe:)
K
Thanks, K. It's going to be a bad one, and right now the models are predicting a direct hit. We were without power for five days after Irma, so if I disappear for a week or so, that's the likely cause.
DeleteI'm also hoping the storm stays offshore. Keep safe and 'raise the flag' when the storm has passed.
DeleteT
You betcha', T. They think it'll hit full force Monday, possibly as a Category 5, though there's a slim chance of a cold front pushing it a little offshore Sunday. The next two days will tell the tale.
DeleteThanks.
Apropos of something or nothing:
ReplyDeleteThe infamous 12/26/96 morning photo of the hallway leading to the wine cellar shows the golf clubs leaning against the wall in the right foreground.
The energetic followers of this mystery recall John Ramsey's request of Patsy's sister (Pam?) to retrieve his golf bag when she was allowed by Boulder police to remove personal items from the house in the days following the murder.
Like others presumably, this writer assumed Ramsey was requesting the retrieval of the small bag with the golf clubs in it (country club golfers often keep both a lighter "carrying bag" and a larger, much heavier and expensive, "cart bag" with their name shown on it, like a professional) shown in the right foreground of the hallway photo.
If you look at the photo very closely, a large golf bag (probably dark brown leather and vinyl), sans any visible golf clubs, looms in the background on the left side in the upper portion of the photo, closer to the wine cellar door, and appears to have John Ramsey's name stitched into the front of it.
Since Ramsey was quoted as wanting his "golf bag" retrieved, with no mention of golf "clubs" that this writer can recall (without researching it at the moment), the writer surmises that the large leather monogrammed bag is the one that Ramsey wanted retrieved.
If so, then make of it what you will.
Black Sheep
More to the point, as you introduced it, what do you make of it?
DeleteAfter looking further there isn't much to make of it, as in June 1998 with Kane and Smit (excerpted below), John addresses his big monogrammed [purple, not brown] golf bag, and strongly denies (truthfully it appears) having mentioned anything about "getting his golf clubs" (before the funeral).
ReplyDeleteIn the third hand recounting by someone earlier in 1998 who supposedly had overheard his asking before the funeral whether or not his "golf bag" had been retrieved, the clubs aren't even mentioned in that person's recounting. People seemed to miss the distinction between a bag and clubs, perhaps because a golf club was so focused on as being a possible murder weapon.
Regardless, as to physical evidentiary value: Pam was not allowed in the basement at all, so it is likely that police went through both the big bag and little bag during their investigations.
"June 1998 John Ramsey Interrogation by Lou Smit and Mike Kane (Golf Clubs and Golfing)
0276
14 JOHN RAMSEY: Well, it's obviously been
15 moved around some. This bag has been moved, looks
16 like.
17 MIKE KANE: Which one are you referring to?
18 JOHN RAMSEY: A purple bag with my name on
19 it.
20 MIKE KANE: From where to where?
21 JOHN RAMSEY: Well, it looks like it's been
22 moved down off the pile, because it's usually
23 here. This laundry basket doesn't show in here.
24 LOU SMIT: So it looks like something has
25 been moved between the time this picture was taken
0277
1 and this picture was taken?
2 JOHN RAMSEY: It looks like this cane
3 has been moved. It's hard to tell from the
4 picture. 5 LOU SMIT: (INAUDIBLE)
6 JOHN RAMSEY: It looks like those little
7 marks
8 are right on the heel in the back hallway.
(SNIP)
0642
20 MIKE KANE: Do you remember the day
21 after this happened, being on the phone talking
22 to someone about getting your golf clubs?
23 JOHN RAMSEY: No. Absolutely not."
BS
All of which begs the question: Why post nonsense before research? You're living up to your initials, again.
DeleteObviously Kane appeared to be interested, as he asked the above question in the June 1998 interview, though addressing the question with respect to golf clubs not the bag.
ReplyDeleteAside from the the clubs versus bag loophole, if Mrs. Fernie's supposed recounting in January 1998 was accurate, the common sense speculation was why a man who had just lost his daughter would care anything at all about whether his golf bag had been retrieved from the house.
Not the bag in the hallway photo with clubs in it, but a much larger bag near the wine cellar door it appears from the context. (the photo showing the hallway leading to the wine cellar door was taken before JonBenet's body was discovered according to Smit in the transcript of the June 1998 interviews, and during the investigation both golf bags were moved, of course, such that a later photo following the search warrant showed both bags in a different place, leading to an irrelevant, it seems, or at least highly confusing, back and forth between John and the interviewers in 1998 about the large bag having been moved).
Below is from Kolar's book Foreign Faction (in the passage about Mrs. Fernie's contacting investigators in January 1998 with her recollection about the bag, seemingly being the basis for Kane's above question posed to Ramsey in June 1998):
"Mrs. Fernie recalled that John Ramsey had asked a strange question of the person stopping by her home one evening: He asked if they had remembered to “get his golf bag” from his house. Mrs. Fernie recalled that the individual replied that they had not been able to retrieve the bag, as the police would not let them downstairs."
Kolar, A. James. Foreign Faction: Who Really Kidnapped JonBenet? (p. 326). Ventus Publishing, llc. Kindle Edition.
BS
None of which justifies your initial comment and my response: Why not do the research before posting nonsense, and not for the first time?
DeleteFor those not then here, BS, I'll gladly re-post your idiocies about defamation, and your other quasi-legal meanderings from prior threads.
~Off topic~
ReplyDeleteMany of you are familiar with the websleuths website.
A few more may know of a person that has spent years recreating faces of the deceased to help identify them.
While reading on the Charley Project blog, a new entry has been made with a great interview with Carl.
He is a perfect example of someone using the internet for good.
https://youtu.be/r86eID8R8O8
Carl Koppelman, who recreates images of the unclaimed and unknown victims, some that have never been listed as missing.
Interview on Vice website,
YouTube channel.
Posted on reddit earlier tonight, I haven't listened to it yet. Australian Podcast Interview with John Ramsey from 2016.
ReplyDeleteLink is by user -
"AdequateSizeAttache -
For those who like analyzing John Ramsey's statements, a nearly hour long interview from October 2016 on Australian podcast Nitty Gritty Committee. Recounts, addresses, and answers a bunch of stuff"
https://www.reddit.com/r/JonBenetRamsey/comments/d7fzmm/jonben%C3%A9t_ramseys_dad_my_son_is_innocent/
This interview was done after Burke's Dr. Phil interview and the CBS presentation. Within about 4 years of Jonbenet's murder, tabloids start running stories of BDI, as John mentioned that they sued the tabloids about 4 or five times beginning in 2000-2001 on behalf of Burke when he was 12, "or 13,14".
ReplyDeleteHe said that Burke being on the autism spectrum is "nonsense".
A few things I forgot/didn't know-
They had 24 hour police protection for one year.
That a judge in Atlanta (I believe he said a federal judge) reviewed the case.
A reddit discussion about the ransom note's apparent location made me realize a significant problem with DocG's theory. The most logical place for the note was Jonbenet's bed; that could have bought time, since no one would have been alerted to her disappearance until she was otherwise checked on. In DocG's scenario, time was paramount for John, and this point did indeed end up working against him. On the other hand, an intruder might not want to risk going back upstairs, and might not be too worried about what happens after he leaves. If it was Patsy, she clearly wasn't worried about time, since she "found" the note and alerted others to it. But at least in DocG's scenario, John would have had every reason to place the note on Jonbenet's bed and hope that Patsy didn't check on her too early. DocG's theory did seem more plausible than the popular RDI scenarios, but this is a significant flaw.
ReplyDeleteAre you referring to the entry
Delete"Note placement"
by u/Soundtravels?
I read that yesterday and many made some interesting comments about that. I'm impressed with the topics the forum users keep coming up with.
Sorry, but I don't see the flaw. Why would John care if Patsy found the note "too early"? The position of the note actually casts suspicion on John because it would only have been put on that staircase by someone who knew her early morning habits.
ReplyDeleteI suppose this is a futile discussion. Some have argued that the note's apparent location points to an intruder, since Jonbenet's bed would have been the obvious place for it until one considers practical issues an intruder would have faced. But of course a Ramsey could have realized that. Still, in your theory, it seems like John would have wanted to delay Patsy as much as possible. Yes, he might have wanted Patsy to find the note, but it's hard to believe that he intended to be in the shower when that happened.
ReplyDeleteHe knew Patsy well enough to know that she'd never take an action of that sort without consulting with him first. I'm not sure what your problem is. Coulda shoulda woulda are purely speculative. I've been concentrated essentially on the facts and logic of the case.
DeleteDid a 9 year old adopted child try to harm her family, or did a 22 year old posing as 9 try to?
ReplyDeletehttps://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/parents-who-say-dwarf-girl-20326370
DocG linked to this site back in 2016. While there were not many posts on his blog entry here, the elastic truth site has been updated in 2018.
ReplyDeleteThis person uses several programs to determine the likelihood of authorship of the ransom note between the parents.
(This site was also linked in a current reddit entry).
http://www.elastictruth.com/2016/07/unmasking-jonbenet-ransom-note-with_12.html?m=1
*Of note to the above link, the FBI contacted the site owner showing interest in his use of the software (see comment section)
DeleteThis Friday REELZ will be airing a Jonbenet special called Overkill. This was mentioned on the tv show Celebrity Page today.
ReplyDeleteWhile watching this Overkill program, that I prerecorded, I saw in one of the evidence photo, a new lead, that will solve this case, it startled me, what I saw in one of the evidence photo of Jon benet. My dilemma is who to trust & contact with this new lead that puts all the puzzle into place!
Delete9-year-old charged with 5 counts of murder in central Illinois mobile home fire
ReplyDeletehttps://www.chicagotribune.com/midwest/ct-goodfield-illinois-fire-murder-charges-20191008-ycezsj6zbvcwdgo62xtdirooxu-story.html?outputType=amp
October 8, 2019 article
Hey Folks!
ReplyDeleteOnly 38 posts here, so let's continue over here, shall we?
EG
So who is Joe choosing for his VP?
ReplyDeleteLiz, Kamala, Val, Stacy??
I am leaning towards Kamala.
EG
I suspect either Hillary or Michelle.
ReplyDeleteBut wait, sMarms! You assured us Joe would never be the nominee, that Hillary would magically be nominated at a "brokered convention".
DeleteDo you never tire of being wrong? I know I never tire of pointing out your endless errors.
You're vastly entertaining, and such easy sport.
I'm still not seeing Joe be their nominee.
ReplyDeleteBiden needs 1,991 delegates to win the nomination. He has 2,144.
DeleteHe's been endorsed by ALL his prior competitors. He's been endorsed by Hillary and Michelle.
Just what magical thing are you expecting to happen?
Poor you. Always wrong.
And he's polling 8-14 points ahead of Trump in every swing state. They've no reason to change horses.
DeleteYou're always, always wrong, on every topic, at every turn.
Poor little man.
Biden is so comical. The Democrats must be in pure panic mode.
ReplyDeleteWant a real laugh? Watch Trump:
ReplyDeletehttps://youtu.be/MQmASaUi9pc
I do think the reason they're keeping Joe in the basement is because every time he opens his mouth, he stumbles and loses his train of thought. It's really sad to watch and I agree with Paul that the Dems are petrified about Joe being able to beat Trump and/or even make it to and through the election.
ReplyDeleteDon't trust the polls, CC. Remember 2016? Hillary was ahead all the way up until she lost. It's a big country out there and the silent majority once again, is watching.
This was an interesting video:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-silent-majority-amid-the-violence-11591225650
EG
Oh E, you're smarter than this.
ReplyDeleteTrump was an outlier in 2016 and appealed to many who were dissatisfied with government.
His fuckups are now so numerous, his crimes so blatant, that even a senile old fart like Biden has enormous appeal, simply because HE ISN'T TRUMP.
You seriously think Trump's cognition is superior to Biden's? His motor skills? You think anyone cares at this point?
Have you forgotten the 2018 midterms, the Blue Wave? It was a referendum against Trump. 2020 will be worse. The guy is, justifiably, despised.
My 3-year old niece makes more sense and walks better.
Don't count those chickens, CC. People in this country don't like what they see happening. Riots, looting, killing, radical groups taking over streets in a major city. You can't go out of your houses or open your businesses, but you can pack city streets by the hundreds of thousands and no mention of Covid anywhere by any mayor or governor of those cities EXCEPT when there is a Trump rally. There is a double standard and major hypocrisy going on.
ReplyDeleteThis is about fairness and law and order. It's about right and wrong. Trump doesn't have all the answers, and there are moments I want to smack him myself, HOWEVER, he stands a better chance of winning than Biden. Trump is a much stronger candidate in every way.
I have a feeling you are going to be very disappointed on Nov 4th, 2020.
EG
And I you, E.
ReplyDeleteI know you're better than this.
Trump is a proven crook, liar and sexual predator, all things you abhor.
I get that you live in the most diverse city in the country, and you blame the city's problems on that very racial and ethnic diversity, but white supremacy isn't the answer. Violence isn't the answer.
Nor is Trump.
Move. Come down here. It's past time you got out of the City.
XOXO
Every time the Dems:
ReplyDeleteDefend thugs
Encourage mass protests during a pandemic
Disparage Trump voters and rally attendees
Arrest business owners who are trying to make a living
Allow arsonists, looters and murderers to "Vent"
Allow vandalism and the removal of statues without arresting the lawbreakers
THEY LOSE! The American people are watching, very closely. This is what we call in the business a NIGO - Not In Good Order and in face, total Out of Order.
EG
Oh EG, you're smarter than this. If you were only as smart as Constance.
ReplyDeleteE and I have a personal connection and relationship independent of this blog.
ReplyDeleteButt out, butthead.
The things you don't understand and the errors you make are legion.
Constance, how many rally goers do you think Biden can fit in his basement?
ReplyDelete"E and I have a personal connection and relationship independent of this blog (however I'm going to admonish and patronize her in the open)"....LOL
Constance, does E realize you're a psychopath?
ReplyDeleteAgain with the empty rhetoric which you desperately use to describe any who disagree with you.
DeletePoor little ineffectual man.
I did neither.
ReplyDeleteHow each of us chooses to behave during the pandemic is a personal matter, and hopefully reflects a degree of responsibility to our fellow citizens.
I'm all for the Tulsa rally, as the only people who attend them are already Trump supporters. The more the merrier.
But please, drop more of your pearls of wisdom, NONE of which has been true.
I can't wait.
Here's a pearl. Trump reaches over 90% approval among Republicans. That's even more than 2016.
ReplyDeleteAnd here's another reality check:
ReplyDeleteThat number is put forth solely by Trump and has no corroboration. Unless you'd care to post some?
Republicans are the minority party in this country, and there aren't enough of them to re-elect Trump.
Loser. Liar. Failure.
In March, 65 percent of Republicans viewed Trump’s job performance with strong approval. In June, that dropped to 57 percent, a decline of eight points. The percentage of Republicans who said they somewhat approved of Trump’s performance increased by about four points, meaning a four-point decline overall.
ReplyDeleteYet another sMarmy error.
Poor, ineffectual little man.
ReplyDeleteLiar. Loser. Failure on every topic at every turn.
There was a flotilla of 1000 boats in Jacksonville to celebrate his birthday. Also, he's gotten over a million people to register for his rally in Oklahoma. Just doesn't support your assertions. Psychopath.
ReplyDeleteI don't make assertions. I post verifiable facts.
ReplyDeleteAs always, plug any of my statements into the browser of your choice, then come back and refute facts with facts.
Your hero's going down.
Poor little ineffectual you.
As I've said, I'm all for Trumpsters gathering, particularly in close quarters, indoor spaces.
ReplyDeleteBut your "more than 90% of Republicans" statement was yet another bald-faced lie.
You can hope and pray and lie all you please, but the Great Orange Gasbag is going down, by record numbers.
Poor little you.
It's 96%. I wonder how many Democrats would register for a Biden rally? You think he could draw 1000?
ReplyDeleteScroll up. Per Reuters/Ipsos it's 57%.
ReplyDeleteBiden is too conscientious and responsible to hold a rally in the midst of a pandemic, and with his poll numbers, he need not do so.
Please go to Tulsa.
Reuters is leftist. I'm glad we have your approval for the rally.
ReplyDeleteReuters is an impartial news-gathering agency.
ReplyDeleteNot only do you have my approval, you have my blessing.
Please go to Tulsa.
Please cite your source for "96% .
ReplyDeleteThere's nothing impartial about Reuters. It is leftist propaganda and your "facts" are leftist propaganda. And if your source is Reuters what's point in citing sources? I'll answer for you, propaganda.
ReplyDeleteSince you claim to watch cspan I guess you saw Biden's last event? Was that a commercial for dementia treatment?
ReplyDeleteI donated $25 to "Bikers for Trump" who are going to do crowd control in Tulsa. Don't you love it?
ReplyDeleteNo. Refute facts with facts. What's your source for 96%?
ReplyDeleteSame source as Reuters. Reuters is leftists doing poll. Trump is conservatives doing poll. Both have the same credibility. You're silly to cite polls. I'll cite them back at you.
DeleteLoser. Liar. FAILURE at everything you attempt. EVERYTHING.
ReplyDeletePut up or shut up.
Your hero is losing.
ReplyDeleteYour feeble attempt to validate your masculinity through him is dying, despite your guns.
Problem getting it up?
Poor little man.
CC...You're better than that yourself. Your hatred for DT is blinding your good judgement. Biden will be the President in name only, and at that, only for a short time. He is being pushed far left and that together with him being on the fast track to senility will cause his defeat.
ReplyDeletePeople want law and order, justice and fairness. Right now we have mobs of people controlling the narrative and that cannot stand. This isn't mob rule, we have a criminal justice system that works. The dems with their identity politics are killing this country. Everyone is offended, history is being dismantled before our eyes, streets being overtaken, stores looted, burned to the ground, innocent people being killed and on and on and on. If you want more of THAT kind of America, then you go right ahead and vote for Biden.
EG
I don't want any of that, E. You know me better than that.
ReplyDeleteBut it's foolish to attempt to blame either party for what's wrong with systemic racism.
We're all to blame.
No, Dems are solely responsible for any racism. They're the party of slavery, the Klan and Jim Crow. Who did Lincoln call the "Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse"? Hint, hint-they weren't Republicans.
DeleteAnd you bet I'll hold my nose and vote for Biden, as will most of America, because
ReplyDeleteHE ISN'T TRUMP.
96% of Republicans are voting for Trump.
DeleteConstance, why are black conservatives called Uncle Tom? Isn't that racist?
ReplyDeleteFox poll out today has Trump losing to Biden by 12 points.
ReplyDeleteIt's 57% of 'pubs. Cite your source for 96%, sMarmy.
You've no credibility here without sources.
Liar. Loser. Failure.
Problem getting it up, you pathetic little man who needs guns and Trump to validate himself?
You have no credibility with your cited sources, Psycho.
ReplyDeleteSure I do, which is but one of the reasons you're so jealous of me.
ReplyDeleteIneffectual, impotent little man.
Deceitful, lying, propagandist psycho.
ReplyDeleteNope. Straight up, truthful, with no political agenda other than to help bring down the crook, liar and sexual predator currently occupying the White House.
ReplyDeleteAs ever, plug any of my statements into any browser, check my veracity.
But you won't.
12 points down today, per Fox.
Read 'em and weep, sMarms.
Yup.
ReplyDeleteLet's go, sMarmy. E has given us plenty of space, and you've proven you have plenty of time: List all my many "lies", and be prepared to prove them.
ReplyDeleteYou can't.
Ineffectual, impotent little man, hiding behind the Great Orange Gasbag and his own guns to affirm his masculinity.
SAD.
Had you a source for your "96%" you'd post it.
ReplyDeleteYou do not, which makes you the propagandist and, as ever, a
LIAR, LOSER and FAILURE, you tiny little ineffectual, impotent man.
Already asked and answered, Psycho.
ReplyDeleteSo, your alternative to Trump is non-stop violence? All day temper tantrums and destroying businesses? Yes, I think most Americans are going to vote for that. It will be interesting to watch the contrast between the law abiding citizens inside at Trump's rally and the immature anarchists destroying things outside.
ReplyDeleteYou answered nothing. Post your source for "96% of Repyblicans . . .".
ReplyDeleteNo. Violence begets nothing but violence, and I abhor what's happening in the streets of America.
But if you think Trump, our #1 racist, going to Tulsa during the midst of a pandemic is going to calm the waters you're even stupider than I thought.
And I know you're pretty stupid.
Post your sources.
ReplyDeleteAsked and answered, Repeat. Answer my questions, Repeat.
ReplyDelete51% of likely voters believe President Trump is going to win re-election.
ReplyDeleteAsked, but not answered. Here, I'll give you a hand:
ReplyDeleteYour source was Trump, who's lied to the American populace more than 18,000 times. Not a good source.
"Likely voters"? What are those, exactly?
Billy B's attempt to dump the attorney for the SDNY just failed miserably, as did his attempt to save Flynn. You support a bunch of crooks, losers and racists.
Trump's approval rating is in the toilet.
Biden leads him by 8-14 points in every poll in every swing state.
Your dear leader is going down, sMarms, you ineffectual, impotent little man.
Nothing will happen to Flynn and SDNY prosecutor is gone.
DeleteGo to Tulsa! It's but an eight hour drive.
ReplyDeleteAnd hey! Cheering your Great Orange Gasbag might possibly give you your longed-for hard on!
A "million tickets", sMarms?
ReplyDeleteYour hero couldn't even fill a 19,000 seat arena in deep red Tulsa tonight.
Trump's going down, and not in a good way.
Poor ineffectual impotent you.
6,200 attendees.
ReplyDeleteSAD.
Constance, that's 6200 more than Biden had at his rally. Oh wait! What rally? How many do you think he can fit into his basement?
ReplyDeleteNo rally necessary.
ReplyDeleteHe's beating Trump in every poll in every swing state without leaving his home.
Hillary did too. Right up to election day.
ReplyDelete6200 attendees, sMarmy.
ReplyDeleteYou assured us there would be "a million".
Which makes you wrong yet again.
Hey Goofball,
DeleteYou're such a lying propagandist. How would I assure there would be "a million" if the stadium only holds 19K? I said 1 million registered. I registered. There was no way I was going to go.
"The crowds are unbelievable," Trump said. "They haven't seen anything like it."
ReplyDeleteNow the Tulsa Fire Department is saying fewer than 6,200 people at BOK.
LIAR. LOSER. FAILURE.
You lying propagandist psychopath. Show one reputable quote where Trump said that.
DeleteYou never answer any questions but just spew propaganda and talking points so I don't expect you to answer this. But, can you tell me what Joe Biden meant when speaking at Robert Byrd's eulogy he said Senator Byrd spoke "truth to power." What did he mean by that?
ReplyDeleteWhat does it matter ten years down the road?
ReplyDeleteIneffectual, impotent and always wrong.
Loser. Liar. Failure.
Didn't think so.
ReplyDeleteConstance, do they send all of you to the Saul Alinsky Academy or the Joseph Goebbels Academy?
ReplyDeleteI don't blame the Democrats for trying to rewrite history. They're the party of slavery, Trail of Tears, the KKK, Jim Crow, Japanese American internment, and The Great Society.
ReplyDeleteConstance, were you in Lincoln Park today with your comrades? You had a tough time trying to tear down that Jackson statue. Too bad the police arrived. Was that you shouting insults at them?
ReplyDeleteAppeals Court orders dismissal of Flynn case.
ReplyDelete104 wounded and 14 dead in one day in Chicago. NYC, 24 shot in one day. 30% increase in murder in NYC this year. De Blasio disbanded the city's anti-crime unit. In Seattle, a 19 year old was murdered in CHAZ. Minneapolis, one dead and 11 injured. NC, two dead, seven wounded. And, on and on. Weekend of violence. The good citizens of America need to take up arms and stop this. The government has acquiesced to the thugs.
ReplyDeleteNow the thugs are planning to tear down the Lincoln statue in Lincoln Park. Yes, this is all about racism.
ReplyDeleteFinally, SCOTUS rules with Trump administration on several immigration issues.
ReplyDeleteConstance, we finally know where your utopia is......CHAZ. Or, is it CHOP?
ReplyDeleteThe US posted a record number of new coronavirus cases yesterday, the death toll topped 125,000, the epidemic is surging in swing states Trump desperately needs but is already losing, 40 million are unemployed, we're in a recession, yet he continues to lie and deny.
ReplyDeleteTrump said he's "flattened the curve", he rails against wearing masks, he's planning more rallies in enclosed spaces without social distancing, and yesterday he directed the withdrawal of Federal funding for testing sites.
All his attempts to distract, like yapping about lobsters and statues are failing as miserably as he is.
The US is at the epicenter of the pandemic, worldwide, so Trump finally got his wish:
America first!
It is not about Trump. It has never been about Trump. You leftists hate this country and all for which it stands, the institutions, the history, the culture. CHAZ or CHOP is your leftist utopia. Why don't you move there, Constance? You'd be much happier.
ReplyDeleteIf Biden wins you believe your leftist utopia will come to be. Nope. The Republic will be over, but your leftist utopia will not happen. Here where I live and many other places already have our utopia. The leftists tried to come here but we threw them out. We are armed. We can defend ourselves. We can grow food and take care of ourselves. You and your ilk are going to have problems. I wonder if you'll keep your federal pension? Good luck.
Of course it's about Trump, who lied and denied about the pandemic for 70 days, causing the resulting economic crisis.
ReplyDeleteHe continues to lie and deny, as the epidemic and the recession worsen.
I have no wish for a "leftist utopia" and no Federal pension.
Trump validates you; you're an unbridled racist with deep-seated fears and feelings of inferiority.
The latter are entirely justified.
OK, so you said you husband was a former FBI, prosecutor and federal judge. That usually comes with a federal pension.
DeleteNope. Never been a racist. Neither is Trump. The racists are on the left. The Democrats, KKK, Jim Crow, Nazis, Fascists, Marxists are all leftists. Those are the racists, not conservatives. You keep getting it wrong. That is a typical leftist tactic. Accuse your opponent of what you are.
Trump has tried to keep us out of a recession but the media and your leftist brethren have done everything they could to hinder the recovery and exacerbate a recession. Well, I think they might get much more than what they wanted. No one but an absolute retard blames this economy on Trump.
DeleteAntifa, BLM, racists. Conservatives, not.
ReplyDeleteYou are one very confused and disturbed guy, and blindingly stupid in the bargain.
ReplyDeleteYour guns aren't going to save you from that.
You don't understand simple math. Funny that you call anyone stupid or believe you can think logically.
ReplyDeleteHere's all the math anyone needs to understand right now:
ReplyDeleteTrump is losing, country-wide and in every state, by 10 points in the poll averaging.
He knows it, too. He told Hannity on Thursday night that Biden will be the next president. The only person who doesn't get it is you, which makes you not only blindingly stupid but a
LIAR, LOSER and FAILURE yet again.
Seriously disturbed? So, you wanted a psychopath like yourself to win? Someone who solicited foreign interference in the election. Then you rooted for the Democrats to impeach Trump without an impeachable offense just because you don't like him. You supported Adam Schiff's trumped up impeachment attempt with his phony "whistleblower" and you support Pelosi, Schumer, Nadler, all psychopaths like you. Disturbed? The only one disturbed here is you, psychopath.
ReplyDeleteOh, and by the way, I fully understand Biden could win. However, my attitude is that if America is stupid enough to put the leftists in charge then so be it. The Republic will be no more. I would hate that but could live with it. Can you? I will help start a new Republic.
ReplyDeleteIt was Trump who solicited foreign interference in the last election and the next.
ReplyDeleteTrump committed impeachable offenses and was in fact impeached.
I don't care for Pelosi, Schiff, Schumer, Nadler or Biden, but:
Trump is a proven crook, liar and self-acknowledged sexual predator.
Anyone is preferable to that.
Wrong, it was Clinton who worked with Steele to produce a phony dossier. Steele's sources were Russian operatives.
ReplyDeleteThere was no impeachable offense.
However, you're a leftist just like they are.
Trump is the most consequential President in our lifetime.
Judicial Watch announced today that the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) released 80 pages of records that show top Obama White House officials scrambling to “evolve” its false claims that the September 11, 2012, terrorist attacks on U.S. Government facilities in Benghazi, Libya, began “spontaneously” in response to an anti-Muslim video on the Internet. The emails show top Obama White House official Ben Rhodes and Clinton State Department Deputy Chief of Staff Jake Sullivan joking about being called “liars” and “leakers.”.....
ReplyDeleteYou must be thinking about Obama. I know it is easy for you to get confused. Let's start at the beginning....1 +1 = 2
Here's your 1 + 1:
ReplyDelete"Russia, if you're listening . . ." in 2016.
His extortion of Ukraine in 2018.
His plea from the White House driveway to China in 2019.
He's up to his fat ass in loans from Chinese and Russian banks which he cannot repay.
And now today there's a new scandal: The Taliban, whose representatives he invited to Camp David, were paid by Russia to kill American troops in Afghanistan. Trump has known since March, yet saw fit to invite Russia back to the G7, and continues to praise Putin.
He's a proven crook, liar, sexual predator and now a traitor.
You're a matched pair.
Russia, in 2016, that was Hillary.
ReplyDeleteNo not extortion, he's the President.
His plea to China from driveway....are you a moron?
Bullshit
Oh, maybe Schiff can produce some more phony charges. It'll make you happy.
Only liar and crook was Obama. You had no problem with that.
You're not only a psychopath, you're an illogical psychopath.
And you're a liar.
ReplyDeleteEverything I post can be verified with a browser search.
Everything.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYou neglected to mention Trump's four recent, resounding losses in the Supremes and two lower courts, one of which was funding for his vanity Wall.
ReplyDeleteTrump has admitted he's losing to Biden. He's been rebuked by both Graham and Grassley, who are quickly backing away from him.
One of his own advisors yesterday predicted the most stunning electoral college loss in political history.
That's a lot of losing in a week.
As the epidemic and the economy continue to worsen, so will his numbers. He's all about perception, sees himself as a winner; this must be a tremendous blow to his fragile ego.
I can't help but wonder if he'll resign, head off to Qatar where there's no extradition and he has one of his cheesy properties, to avoid prosecution by the SDNY and the State of New York.
I think it is an obvious and excellent choice.
Then we can, hopefully, begin to heal
You are comical. You believe there will be healing? So, you leftists will stop your temper tantrums after you win? And, you think everyone will be happy? And, you think that is healing because you've stopped your temper tantrums. There will be no healing. You've shown yourselves. We don't want to live with you or your ideals. If Biden wins the Republic is over. Also, nothing will happen to Trump. He will have to flee nowhere. And, if you think Biden will win because your polls are telling you that then you're even more delusional than I thought. If Trump loses it won't be because of polls.
ReplyDeleteThe only way Trump loses is if he disconnects with his base. He hasn't done that yet. He is still connected. I can assure you.
ReplyDeleteAlso, you think if Trump loses everything will be hunky dory? Do you think BLM and Antifa will stop? You think you'll be able to control your thugs at that point? You are a moron. They will come for you.
ReplyDeleteHis base comprises 25-30% of the electorate, not enough to get him elected. He needs the Independents and disaffected Dems who dragged him across the line last time, and he's lost them, just as he's lost women, Blacks, Hispanics and the over-60 set.
ReplyDeleteHe's got nothing but his diminishing cult.
Of course he'll be prosecuted once out of office, at both the state and federal level. Tax fraud, bank fraud, as well as criminal charges in the University and Foundation cases.
Yeah, I think once the Racist-in-Chief is out the protests will abate.
No one is coming for me, you fear-mongering, gun-toting, impotent idiot, any more than anyone is coming for you.
The Republic will not be over when Biden wins.
Get a grip.
Delusional.
ReplyDeleteOh, by the way, not impotent. But I'm sure your ovaries dried up long ago.
ReplyDeleteOf course you are; hence your preoccupation with guns and violence.
DeleteIt's a well-documented psychological condition.
They provide the illusion of manliness.
You're a shrew and a harpy. You must have made your husband miserable.
DeleteRealistic.
ReplyDeleteUn.
ReplyDeleteNope. My husband was, unlike you, intelligent, educated and accomplished. We had 32 very happy years together.
ReplyDeleteYou're just an impotent redneck loser.
I'm sure you were happy, as much as you could be being a psychopath.
ReplyDeleteYou're too stupid and uneducated to understand the term "psychopath".
ReplyDeleteTo you it's merely anyone who disagrees with you, you ignorant hick.
No, you demonstrate all the traits. Just bought an 840 round ammo can of 5.56.
ReplyDeleteI can tell you where to get it if you would like.
ReplyDelete". . . Socially irresponsible behavior; disregarding or violating the rights of others;inability to distinguish between right and wrong;difficulty with showing remorse or empathy; tendency to lie often; manipulating and hurting others; recurring problems with the law; general disregard towards safety and responsibility."
ReplyDeleteNothing there describes me. Nothing.
I merely disagree with you and hate your hero and what he's done to this country.
No thanks; I'm non-violent and, unlike you, not a wacko reactionary.
But ooooh! Maybe that'll help you get it up tonight!!!
Read the definition of psychopathy from Healthlines again.
ReplyDeleteNothing in it applies to me, but every line, without exception, describes Trump.
Every line.
CNN now admits that the drug hydroxychloroquine, hasn't outperformed others as a COVID 19 treatment.
ReplyDelete"CNN now admits . . "???
ReplyDeleteWhaddaya' nuts? The only ones who have not known or admitted this for months are you and Trump.
Liar. Loser. Failure at everything you touch.
Went right over your head, didn't it? CNN is admitting now that hydroxychloroquine and zinc works, just not better than anything else, like Remdesivir. I never said it worked better than Remdesivir or antibody therapy. I just said it worked. You're the one who said it didn't work and was dangerous. I know logic is a difficult concept for you but can you at least try? Again, 1+1=2.
DeleteIt doesn't work.
DeletePublish any proof you have that it does other than anecdotal.
Make that three losses in the Supremes, as today SCOTUS struck down Louisiana's anti-abortion law.
ReplyDeleteSo much losing! So little time!
Did Trump have something to do with Louisiana's anti-abortion law? Trump has always wrongly supported baby killing. It is something you two have in common.
ReplyDeleteWe now have evidence that Hunter Biden made 5 trips to China while his Daddy was VP. Of course, Uncle Joe doesn't know anything about that. Just like he didn't know anything about the Flynn case. Or did he just forget? He's forgetting everything. I wonder if he remembers that he is running for President?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHHS has purchased all of Gilead's supply of Remdesivir at $3200 per treatment. This is one million treatments at over three billion dollars. It is instead of buying one million doses of hydroxychloroquine and zinc at $50 per treatment. This makes Doctor Fauci and Constance happy.
ReplyDeleteWhat would make Fauci and me happy is more face masks and social distancing.
DeleteAs always, post your proof of hydroxychloroquine's efficacy against coronavirus.
Real proof. No more idiotic anecdotes.
"Post your proof of hydroxychloroquine's efficacy." Wow, you sound so scientific and erudite. Funny, coming from someone with your math skills. There's no such thing as proof in science. I've explained that to you. But you don't get math. There is a lot of evidence, however. Go look for it.
DeleteTrump changed his pro-choice stance immediately after his inauguration with the "Gag Rule" and then declaring that women who undergo abortions should be "punished". So yeah, he had a stake in today's Supreme Court loss.
ReplyDeleteIvanka has 18 trademarks issued by China during daddy's presidency, and owns factories there.
Since Trump is inherently stupid, is having trouble walking, drinking water and speaking in coherent sentences, I'd be careful.
He's also losing, spectacularly.
Poor little you.
Everytime I hear him asked about it he seems to support your baby killing stance. He's not really a conservative in that area, too much Ivanka.
DeleteIvanka actually runs a business. She hasn't received payoffs because of who here Daddy is. In Ukraine, Biden withheld funding to stop prosecution of Burisma. In China, Hunter brought back over a billion dollars of "investment". So, you say Ivanka got "trademarks?" So what? Her clothing line was shuttered.
DeleteOf course she got the deals because of her father, who was then involved in trade negotiations with China.
DeleteShow me the proof that Biden withheld funds because of Burisma.
Did you see the video? Is a video proof? What other proof do you need? I know proof is a difficult concept for you. Show proof she got the deals because of her father.
DeleteNo. You don't get to duck and dodge.
ReplyDeletePublish your scientific proof of hydroxychloroquine's efficacy.
Explain to us how Hunter Biden's "five trips to China" are more egregious sins than Ivanka's 18 trademark deals and two factories.
Make sense for a change.
I told you there's no such thing as scientific proof. That's an oxymoron.
ReplyDeleteBecause he brought back cash. Another difficult concept for you I know.
Real doctors, in the field, are using it to treat their patients. That's all the "evidence" I need. Don't need an FDA "efficacy." Gee, you're so smart with your big words.
ReplyDeleteSince both the FDA and the American College of Physicians have warned against the use of hydroxychloroquine as treatment for coronavirus, that's doubtful.
ReplyDeleteThat warning was based on faulty data used by the Lancet "study." Doctors don't need an efficacy study to administer medicine. Hydroxychloroquine is safe and been used for decades to treat malaria and lupus. Also, the evidence isn't anecdotal. You and Dr. Fauci need to learn the meaning of anecdotal. These are medical professionals scientifically administering medication to their patients and recordings dosages, effects and results. This isn't anecdotal. I know it is natural for you to acquiesce to the authority of the Federal Government but real medical professionals don't need Fauci, the CDC, or the FDA to treat their patients.
ReplyDeleteNope. It's based on numerous studies that show the risks outweigh the benefits for coronavirus patients. Look it up.
ReplyDeleteReal medical professionals follow guidelines, though perhaps not there in Hicksville.
Responsible adults do as well, by wearing masks and social distancing.
You should consider independent thinking and research rather than blindly following your idiotic, LOSING hero.
Yup. If you paid attention to the Lancet study you'd have seen they picked the highest risk categories to report their findings. It was all designed as a political stunt instead of anything scientific. Independent thinking? You're a leftist drone who repeats talking points.
ReplyDeleteSo, why did the Lancet study retract the paper?
ReplyDeleteSo, why did the New England Journal of Medicine retract the findings?
ReplyDeleteBecause they were based on file review rather than patient interaction.
ReplyDeleteThere are other clinical studies that prove the failure/danger of hydroxychloroquine, including in the UK, France and here at home.
You're just trying to distract from Trump's latest Russia scandal.
Good luck with that.
They knew what kind of data it was and they published it anyway. They hoped no one would notice. They seriously damaged their reputations with their political idiocy.
DeleteNo there aren't. None of those studies used hydroxychloroquine with zinc supplement. They were all false studies. There are real doctors in France prescribing hydroxychloroqine and zinc with positive results. As I've explained to you it is the zinc that kills the virus. It acts just like Remdesivir on the virus replicase. You mean Trump's latest Russia fake news? Here you go again with your marching orders and talking points.
ReplyDeleteThe Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine study cherry picked their data from the 4th quartile, the most high risk group. Do you want me to explain it to you?
ReplyDeleteSure thing, sMarmy . . . "it is the zinc". The shit is dangerous, it doesn't work and you've no verifiable proof that it does.
ReplyDeleteIt's not fake news.
Not only is it real, it's already losing Trump vets and the military.
He's got nothing left but his cult, and even that's slipping in the face of 127,000 dead, 40M unemployed, a resurging epidemic and the worst economy since the Depression.
But you go, sMarms!
But I go sMarms? What does that mean? Are you hyperventilating?
ReplyDeleteDid you know that Surgisphere refused to provide their full data used in the retrospective study published by Lancet and the NEJM for independent review?
ReplyDeleteConstance, that's unscientific. Science demands complete transparency. I thought I might need to point that out to you.
ReplyDeleteTrump is losing by double digits to a senile old man.
ReplyDeleteThe epidemic has killed 127,000 Americans. There are 40M unemployed and the economy is in the toilet.
All thanks to your hero.
Focus.
Typical leftist redirect when confronted with facts. Not very clever.
ReplyDeleteClever enough.
ReplyDeleteI've no interest in YOUR attempts at misdirection, or your hero's with his lobsters and statues.
The coronavirus is surging. Americans are dying, despite your assurance that it would "all be over by April 2" and "bottomed out by April 3".
LOSER. LIAR. FAILURE.
Did you know the NYT story about Trump being briefed about the GRU offering Taliban fighters bounties on US soldiers was fake news? Did you know that? Or, were you intentionally or ignorantly spewing leftist propaganda?
ReplyDeleteIs that one of your 19,000 lies that Trump has told? Why don't we go through the 19,000 lies one by one and show us your proof of each lie. Let's start with lie #1.
ReplyDeleteYou betcha. The crowd size at his inauguration.
ReplyDeleteOK, let's see evidence of the lie and your proof it was a lie. I saw photos of the crowd. It was a big crowd.
ReplyDeleteit isn't fake news, sMarms.
ReplyDeleteIt's been verified by the CIA and other intel organizations. Look it up.
It's as real as it gets, and Trump wants to pretend he wasn't briefed?
As if.
It is fake news. The intelligence community assessed that the information was suspect so they didn't brief Trump. This is according to the Washington Examiner. Who has more credibility the Washington Examiner or the NYT?
DeleteThere are photos of the crowd size. Look 'em up.
ReplyDeleteI did. It was a very big crowd.
DeleteEveryone know the photos and videos CNN published were early before everyone arrived.
Delete