tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post6721133977676296479..comments2024-02-23T18:09:21.379-05:00Comments on Solving the JonBenet Ramsey Case: The 911 CallDocGhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17359004200002936544noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-18435385603045341842016-03-23T21:50:09.297-04:002016-03-23T21:50:09.297-04:00So if we're talking about this is a two people...So if we're talking about this is a two people crime, and we know now DNA evidence was found that didn't belong to a Ramsey, is there a possibility that John and another adult male could have been involved? Could both Patsy and John be telling the truth about the 911 call? Let's say Patsy runs in with this note, John knows the body is there and will be found (has helped stage the break in and note), and tells her to call the police. The amount demanded in the note is equal to the bonus John Ramsey received that year from his company, which would leave me to believe its someone close to him or John himself.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03990457055927402539noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-51671317146302982872015-12-16T23:00:42.628-05:002015-12-16T23:00:42.628-05:00I invite you to read the following blog post, whic...I invite you to read the following blog post, which explains why the DNA evidence means little: http://solvingjonbenet.blogspot.com/2012/07/the-touch-dna.html<br /><br />This is not only my opinion, but essentially the same interpretation of this evidence has been expressed by many DNA experts and many law enforcement people generally, including the lead detective at the time, James Kolar, whose book you should read as well.DocGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17359004200002936544noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-12907379971081543992015-12-16T21:51:50.002-05:002015-12-16T21:51:50.002-05:00There was on Jonbenet DNA evidence to support an u...There was on Jonbenet DNA evidence to support an unknown male. How can you say there was no conclusive evidence to support an intruder? DNA is the strongest form of forensic evidence we have. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04401434446993982377noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-6545968377924403352012-09-16T16:20:56.490-04:002012-09-16T16:20:56.490-04:00Good point! Thanks. I deal with the timing and the...Good point! Thanks. I deal with the timing and the trip in the next installment, which is now up.DocGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17359004200002936544noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-72052286888428650892012-09-16T12:16:04.170-04:002012-09-16T12:16:04.170-04:00Looking forward to more on the 911 call. I think ...Looking forward to more on the 911 call. I think when you say they wouldn't have called so early in the morning, it tends to make people think of the time of day -e.g. 5:52 am. The problem of course is not the time of day, but the fact that the body is still in the house. It's true that if they dumped the body, then waited for a while, then called 911 it would be later in the day, but the important thing is the body would be gone. People get confused and think the call had to be made early because of the trip to MI. and the need to re-route JAR and MR. Some calls needed to be made, but not the 911 call. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com