tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post5746518508862660125..comments2024-02-23T18:09:21.379-05:00Comments on Solving the JonBenet Ramsey Case: The CruxDocGhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17359004200002936544noreply@blogger.comBlogger93125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-42092288395991177792020-09-11T13:09:18.615-04:002020-09-11T13:09:18.615-04:00- Sig = John Bennett Ramsey or Lin Wood? - Sig = John Bennett Ramsey or Lin Wood? Hammermordehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05288071895414946247noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-26593781259422814532014-12-29T12:32:10.762-05:002014-12-29T12:32:10.762-05:00I'll make it really easy for you. A pedophile ...I'll make it really easy for you. A pedophile would have had no reason to write a ransom note. A kidnapper would have prepared his note in advance. An intruder deciding to kidnap on the spur of the moment would not have taken the time and trouble to pen a 2 1/2 page ransom note. And someone trying to frame John or Patsy would not have written a note in his own hand, but would have forged John or Patsy's hand. <br /><br />When we combine the above with John's obvious lies regarding the broken basement window, it becomes crystal clear that there was no intruder, that John wrote the note and attempted to stage a break-in at that window.<br /><br />When you include all the many other reasons for focusing on John Ramsey, as presented on this blog, then there is clearly more than enough probable cause to indict him for the murder of his daughter and put him on trial. If he's innocent then he'll have ample opportunity to defend himself before a jury of his peers in a court of law.DocGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17359004200002936544noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-42221025642113402972014-12-29T12:08:39.559-05:002014-12-29T12:08:39.559-05:00Since you claim I'm blaming "the Ramseys&...Since you claim I'm blaming "the Ramseys" then obviously you haven't read much in this blog. Read some more and you'll learn why I've become convinced that John and only John could have committed this crime. An intruder, any intruder, can easily be ruled out, not only by the lack of any convincing intruder evidence, but also by the absurdity of any possible intruder theory.DocGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17359004200002936544noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-88328014214131308342014-12-29T11:48:06.303-05:002014-12-29T11:48:06.303-05:00This video is based on the seriously flawed detect...This video is based on the seriously flawed detective work of Lou Smit, who very quickly went from being an investigator to being a Ramsey advocate. My reasons for rejecting Smit's view of the case can be found here: http://solvingjonbenet.blogspot.com/2012/07/the-lou-smit-show.html<br />DocGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17359004200002936544noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-7239755694211259982014-12-29T03:53:54.183-05:002014-12-29T03:53:54.183-05:00They don't respond because this blog is innuen...They don't respond because this blog is innuendo and theory. Nothing they care to read. They can't and wont persue John Ramsey anymore because they know an intruder did it and they let this person slip through their fingers. They have no time for or interest in bloggers,Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-494880553773872142014-12-29T03:48:15.252-05:002014-12-29T03:48:15.252-05:00The travesty is that John has lost everything, 2 d...The travesty is that John has lost everything, 2 daughters, a wife, his businesses, his reputation, because he has been proven guilty in the court of public opinion when he has done nothing wrong. SadAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-90751733855539033652014-12-29T03:37:10.615-05:002014-12-29T03:37:10.615-05:00It WAS an intruder. He came in under the grate and...It WAS an intruder. He came in under the grate and window, went straight up the stairs to the kitchen, calmly wrote a menacing note, hid under the bed in John Andrews room, used a stun gun on Jon Benet, took her to the basement and brutally murdered her. Perhaps he was a psychopath, perhaps, obsessed with JonBenet, perhaps angry with John Ramsey, never the less, it was a premeditated crime done by an intruder. The note was left to throw everyone off, which it has for years. His intent was to rape and murder, not to kidnap and not for money and it was not John. Patsy or Burke Ramsey. Doc, if you are really pationate about this case, you must realize you are biased and not looking at all of the facts. Its easy to say, the perfect family full of dark secrets, including a pedophile father and maybe mother too did this, but they didn't, and we wont know who did as long as people like you keep blaming the Ramseys. EVERYTHING points to an intruder in this caseAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-86598172715857165262014-12-29T03:24:33.902-05:002014-12-29T03:24:33.902-05:00If you REALLY want to know what happened to Jon ...If you REALLY want to know what happened to Jon Benet Ramsey go to youtube and search for::The Killing of JonBenet (2001)<br />It's obvious Boulder Police, were extremely negligent and an intruder killed the child. We will never know who, because the evidence has been compromised.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-77265758956798912152014-07-20T11:00:38.686-04:002014-07-20T11:00:38.686-04:00Your theory that an intruder could have written th...Your theory that an intruder could have written the note to delay involvement by the police does make some sense. The note says the "kidnapper's" call will come "tomorrow," so, if the warnings in the note had frightened the Ramseys into not calling the police until after the ransom had been paid, that would have given the perp over 24 hours to get away.<br /><br />The only problem is the inordinate length of the note and all the details about delivery of the ransom cash. An intruder cautious enough to write a note to delay police involvement would not have been so reckless as to sit down and compose such an elaborate note while in the house, where someone might have awakened at any time and called the cops then and there.<br /><br />All that would have been necessary would have been a note that said "We have your daughter. We'll call you tomorrow between 8 and 10AM with details on paying the ransom. We are monitoring police communications so don't call the police or she will die."<br /><br />Another option would have been to call the Ramsey home from a pay phone with a similar warning. No need to write a note at all.<br /><br /><br /><br />DocGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17359004200002936544noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-57941956780011041772014-07-20T07:04:55.553-04:002014-07-20T07:04:55.553-04:00I still believe that the crux of the case is indee...I still believe that the crux of the case is indeed the ransom note. Much has been set about its form, but much less about the more important thing - its function. I dont have a theory that answers all of the questions but it seems that the note did what it was meant to do, delay. Those precious first hours are now down the drain but why was that time needed? The time stated by the killer for the awaited call strikes me as a minimum amount of time needed for something. A getaway maybe? Decaying of forensic evidence?(I dont know the first thing about biology). Or just to escape the city itself if he/she feared a possible perimeter blockade and manhunt within the city? I think the ransom note was meant to do a job. To distract and delay helping the killer not be caught. Was such a theory ever explored? If you think about a possible other party who is still not known(the dna) being the mind and culprit, it really was the perfect crime. Everything found brought nothing but dead ends as intended and the cops went after other parties in a drawn out sequence of wasted time as intended. The note and the dead ends seem to have done what they were meant to do, no theory answers all and the case remains unsolved. Even with the crucial "mistake" of leaving dna is of no consequence bc the possibly crafted dead ends kept it from getting someone caught. Just my thoughtsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-68215081787475495662013-11-04T09:27:29.007-05:002013-11-04T09:27:29.007-05:00I have a feeling you won't protest when I asse...I have a feeling you won't protest when I assert that the most likely molester in that house would certainly have been the only mature male in the house. And yet, one of the lead investigators, det. Steve Thomas, chose to give him a "pass" and focused instead on Patsy. To explain the obvious sexual assault, he claimed her wounds were more consistent with a coverup than anything sexual. Sorry, but I have a very hard time buying such a strange idea. He also dismisses the evidence of chronic abuse, because it doesn't fit his bizarre theory that Patsy "accidentally" murdered her daughter and then covered up with an off the wall plan involving a staged sexual assault, staged "garotte" strangulation and staged kidnap note. The much more likely possibility that John was molesting his daughter and killed her to keep her quiet appears to be something that never occurred to him.DocGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17359004200002936544noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-70113363669839556542013-11-04T09:05:02.086-05:002013-11-04T09:05:02.086-05:00I do not think the RN is the crux of the case. It...I do not think the RN is the crux of the case. It certainly is a HUGE, mind boggling clue, but I think the real crux of the case is the sexual assault. Based on several doctors' opinions and the autopsy, most would agree that there was evidence of prior sexual abuse. I do not think the trauma she suffered that night was part of any staging. It is a real clue.<br /><br />If an intruder was in that house that night and either planned on kidnapping JB, torturing her, sexually assaulting her, or all of the above, he would NOT stay in that house with her. I feel strongly about this. Once he had JB in his clutches, he would have gotten out of that house and taken her to a place where he felt safe to do whatever he wanted with her.<br /><br />If Patsy were the one who had been sexually assaulting her, I am sure there were many, many times that she was alone with JB and would have chosen to assault her then, not in the house Christmas night when everyone was home. Plus, I am certain she was exhausted from a full day of Christmas activities and the fact that they had to get up early the next morning.<br /><br />If Burke was the one who had been sexually assaulting her (sorry, Kolar --- I don't buy this either), I think he, too, would have chosen another time to assault her. Certainly not in the house with everyone home, late Christmas night when he, too, was probably extremely tired. I think we all know when boys that age go to bed, they crash out all night. I was molested by my brother when I was 9 years old and he would always do it after school, when my parents weren't home and never at night. <br /><br />So who sexually assaulted her? That says it all for me.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-53495060449171076292013-09-25T22:36:42.395-04:002013-09-25T22:36:42.395-04:00I'm pleased to learn that you agree.
And you...I'm pleased to learn that you agree. <br /><br />And you're right, he probably would have removed the "garotte" before taking the body out of the house, as the paintbrush handle could possibly be traced back to them. <br /><br />As to whether he actually planned on beheading JonBenet, that's an interesting question I hadn't thought of. I certainly hope not, but we will probably never know exactly what he had in mind when he wrote that. He certainly wanted to frighten Patsy into not calling the police, so maybe it was just a bluff.<br /><br />It's also not clear whether he would have simply dumped the body or buried it somewhere hoping it would never be found. Only John knows the answer to that one.DocGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17359004200002936544noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-59189190205257992352013-09-25T17:18:03.585-04:002013-09-25T17:18:03.585-04:00I've read extensively on this case, and was co...I've read extensively on this case, and was convinced early on the JR was the perp for the very reasons you state. He was sexually molesting JBR, and was either caught at it, or afraid she was going to tell. I was never able to reconcile PR's complicity in it though until I read your theory. I just couldn't reconcile her covering for someone who abused and murdered her child. Now it makes sense.<br /><br />One thing bothers me though, the RN stated that she would be beheaded, and he would have had to remove the garrote or it would tie the crime back to the house. I know it takes a pretty sick individual to do what he did to his own daughter, but would he have gone so far as to behead the body prior to dumping it? Or do you think he would have taken the body somewhere so remote he would believe it would never be found?<br /><br />I believe this guy will eventually have to answer for what he's done whether it's in this life, or whatever comes after. But first I hope he has to answer to Patsy for what he did to her own child.....and to his own wife.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-7578755309396659942013-06-20T10:33:20.719-04:002013-06-20T10:33:20.719-04:00Well, thank you so much, your kind words are very ...Well, thank you so much, your kind words are very much appreciated. And if I knew anything about cars I might want to take you up on your job offer. (Actually I'm happy where I am, but thanks anyhow.)<br /><br />As for John Mark Karr, that was certainly an unexpected and also very disturbing development -- especially since the DA dropped him like a hot potato once the DNA results were in and never investigated him very thoroughly at all. It did seem as though he knew a lot about the case, but by that time a great many details had been released to the public, and since he was clearly obsessed, it's not surprising he knew so much. The problem for me is that he was never able to explain any of the aspects of the case that made an intruder seem so unlikely. For example, he claimed he entered the house through the basement window, but never explained how he could have done that without leaving any trace while squeezing through that narrow space.<br /><br />I think he was basically looking for attention and having a great time playing games with the authorities. He was clearly in the driver's seat, since he could tell them whatever he wanted to tell them, and since his family couldn't supply any real proof that he was with them over Xmas, the investigators had no way to tell whether he was being truthful or tailoring his story to suit himself. The bottom line for me is that 1. no intruder theory makes any sense at all; 2. John clearly lied about crucial aspects of the case.<br /><br />I'm sorry to hear about your father. A great many cases go unsolved, usually because there is so little evidence. In the Ramsey case, however, there is plenty of evidence, thus NO excuse!<br />DocGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17359004200002936544noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-71271563073711177742013-06-20T05:53:35.579-04:002013-06-20T05:53:35.579-04:00Dearest DocG,
I have read most if not all of the ...Dearest DocG, <br />I have read most if not all of the material on this site, and never intended to respond until just now. Without any doubt thee key question is to explain the purpose of the ransom note. Your answer to that question inherently answers the other most important questions in the case. You've made a believer out of me and other logical thinking visitors. On a side note, you've been extremely professional in dealing with the more ridiculous respondents to your blog. Anyway, I do have a question. What's up with the John mark karr situation? I think I took his claims a bit more seriously than others for a couple legitimate reasons. A proven pedofile wanted for child pornography, who says he was there but did not commit the crime, knew undisclosed details about the crime scene, and did much in response to his own personal pain. Could he have been present, but perhaps just the camera man for the snuff film some have speculated about? I can't help but think there's something to that. Could he be connected to JR? Is there any proof JR was into that kind of thing? I guess I don't really know where I'm going with this but it begs the question to account for his knowledge of the crime scene which he should not know. The fact this case has gone cold really bothers me. My own father was murdered in 2001 when i was 14 and Detroit police didn't take the investigation seriously, and the truth will likely never be known. My dads killer might well sell me coffee every morning on my way to work, but there isn't much to do because there arent many details to follow such as in this case.(though there were back then) Maybe I think I'd feel better if I can come up with a working theory about JBR, creating the slight possibility that at least one of them will get justice. Sorry to harp on here dear friend, but if someone popped up knowing undisclosed facts about my dads murder, you can believe I'd be running through them like General Patton through Europe. That man would have about 0.5 cigarettes to make a believer out of me as to how he knew that stuff ya know? Anyway, I've really enjoyed your site, you're quite the straight shooter. If you're ever looking for work in the Motor City, I'd love to offer you a lucrative position at Fords historic rouge plant. Til then, cheers!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-30628078648541283732013-02-03T10:15:35.931-05:002013-02-03T10:15:35.931-05:00If you want to take a great deal from this paragra...If you want to take a great deal from this paragraph then you have to apply such <br />techniques to your won weblog.<br /><i>Also see my webpage</i> > <b><a href="http://rcgiannini.com/investorboard/index.php/damienspr" rel="nofollow">cigarette smoking occurred</a></b>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-45284576002409671562013-02-01T08:30:48.282-05:002013-02-01T08:30:48.282-05:00You're so awesome! I do not think I've rea...You're so awesome! I do not think I've read through anything like that before.<br /><br />So good to discover somebody with some original thoughts on this subject.<br /><br />Really.. many thanks for starting this up. This web site is something that is needed on the <br />internet, someone with a little originality!<br /><i>Look at my weblog</i> ; <b><a href="http://yodaq.com/profile/haleyv67" rel="nofollow">kids costumes</a></b>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-84446487239818630382013-01-31T15:05:06.720-05:002013-01-31T15:05:06.720-05:00Good question. No, I don't think she ever susp...Good question. No, I don't think she ever suspected him. First, because he is obviously a master manipulator. Secondly, because she, like everyone else, would have accepted the finding that John was "ruled out" as writer of the note. Since she knew very well that SHE didn't writeit, and was convinced (wrongly) that John couldn't have, then she would have had no doubts regarding an intruder. In her mind, that would have been the only possibility. And thanks to the decision to rule John out, and her conviction that he must be innocent, he would have been able to easily manipulate her into telling a few "white lies" to help him get the authorities off his back. Which is, I think, why she was unwilling to challenge his version of what happened prior to the 911 call and also his story about breaking the window the previous summer.DocGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17359004200002936544noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-43289423869337337572013-01-31T13:30:16.470-05:002013-01-31T13:30:16.470-05:00That is true, valid points. I have been reading th...That is true, valid points. I have been reading this blog when I get the chance and you are the only one that has presented a logical account of any parental involvement. I always discounted the parents involvement and favoured the intruder theory because other websites seem to be so outrageous, saying that JBR was a religious sacrifice, BR did it, PR did it & PR molested JBR. <br /><br />Everytime I think of another question it seems to be covered in another entry that I read later on.<br /><br />Questions I haven't found the answer to yet:<br />Do you think Patsy ever knew that it was John or suspected him? <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-10040960032324769302013-01-31T12:50:40.591-05:002013-01-31T12:50:40.591-05:00Yes, if an intruder was present, he might have pre...Yes, if an intruder was present, he might have prepared the suitcase and opened the window and then changed his mind, that's possible. However, if he exited via a door then why would he have bothered to lock it behind him? Besides, as I believe I demonstrated, John obviously lied about breaking the window earlier -- and his claim that he couldn't recall whether that window had ever been repaired is not credible. <br /><br />The window was clearly broken the night of the crime. The police wouldn't have taken so much time questioning both of them about it if they knew the break was old. And if it was broken by an intruder, then that implies the intruder must have entered via that window. But there was no sign anyone passed through the window, either coming or going. He would have had no reason to break the window if he were just thinking of using it as an exit. So the intruder theory is just one chain of absurdities after another.<br /><br />I think John must have done some staging prior to finding the body. I think he probably changed her into the oversized panties after Patsy called 911, and also he'd have had to clean up the glass under the window. According to Det. Arndt, he vanished from her sight for a significant period that morning, at least 45 minutes, as I recall. So he'd have had plenty of time to improvise a plan B.<br /><br />I'm glad you find my thinking reasonable, thanks.DocGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17359004200002936544noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-30489509365164120542013-01-31T11:12:04.817-05:002013-01-31T11:12:04.817-05:00Very nice article, totally what I needed.
Also vis...Very nice article, totally what I needed.<br /><i>Also visit my weblog</i> : <b><a href="http://serialclubbers.org/profile/10461" rel="nofollow">serialclubbers.org</a></b>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-40889172057976556242013-01-31T10:51:21.964-05:002013-01-31T10:51:21.964-05:00If it was an intruder (not saying it was, I don...If it was an intruder (not saying it was, I don't know what to believe) could he have attempted to make an escape via the basement window but changed his mind? Hence the suitcase/open window.<br /><br />If it was JR do you think he did the staging before he carried JBR upstairs or the previous night?<br /><br />I have always leaned towards an intruder theory because every theory that involved the parents sounded outrageous - except yours. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-45029868719186512662013-01-30T22:05:00.284-05:002013-01-30T22:05:00.284-05:00Good response in return of this difficulty with so...Good response in return of this difficulty with solid <br />arguments and explaining all on the topic of that.<br /><i>Also visit my page</i> ... <b><a href="http://www.mistyfall.org/wiki/index.php?title=Affiliate_Marketing_-_Finding_Proper_Content." rel="nofollow">http://www.mistyfall.org/wiki/Index.php?title=Affiliate_Marketing_-_Finding_Proper_Content.</a></b>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-12780629896451052172013-01-29T20:32:56.604-05:002013-01-29T20:32:56.604-05:00I like the helpful info you provide in your articl...I like the helpful info you provide in your articles. I'll bookmark your weblog and check again here regularly. I am quite certain I'll learn many new stuff right here!<br />Good luck for the next!<br /><i>My site</i> :: <b><a href="http://greenmagpie.offersbookmarks.com/technology/a-whole-new-world-of-web-hosting-services/" rel="nofollow">types of web hosting</a></b>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com