tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post2847827628817806047..comments2024-02-23T18:09:21.379-05:00Comments on Solving the JonBenet Ramsey Case: Suggestions for NewcomersDocGhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17359004200002936544noreply@blogger.comBlogger258125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-89918120898090295642016-09-26T13:20:08.909-04:002016-09-26T13:20:08.909-04:00Is it possible that Burke was the child that was s...Is it possible that Burke was the child that was sexually abused and Jon Benet found out?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-63675172964762250932016-09-15T08:29:23.156-04:002016-09-15T08:29:23.156-04:00DocG, this is the place I broke-in my teeth on thi...DocG, this is the place I broke-in my teeth on this case. I've been reading everything I can get my hands on for the last year and a half. Thank you for your hard work.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-47892782610918252382016-09-08T22:34:56.438-04:002016-09-08T22:34:56.438-04:00Some of the things stated above are not true. Jonb...Some of the things stated above are not true. Jonbenet never went to the doctor 27 times for vaginal infections. Jonbenet went to her pediatrician 32 times over 3 years. She had 3 vaginal infections over 3 years. The other 29 times were for other things like ear infections etc etc .Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-22108989241852380202016-09-07T12:07:49.703-04:002016-09-07T12:07:49.703-04:00There are several things that don't make sense...There are several things that don't make sense to me with this case. They are as follows:<br /><br />1. As a parent, if I awoke to a note like that and my child was missing, I would search every single inch of that house immediately and firstly. The second thing I'd do is wake up the other child and ask if he heard or saw anything unusual during the night. <br />2. I'd cooperate fully with the police and offer anything they asked for or needed in order to find out who did this to my child.<br />3. What kidnapper writes a 3 page ransom note from paper and pen found within the house, as if they had all the time in the world to do so. Even going so far as writing a practice note.<br />4. From what I read, the blanket found wrapped around the child was taken from the dryer. What stranger would know the blanket was in the dryer?<br />5. Why did Patsy lie about the panties found on Jon Benet when she knew that she purchased them for an older niece, but Jon Benet wanted them so she kept them for her.<br />6. What child goes to the doctor 27 times to be treatment for vaginal infections? What kind of doctor doesn't think that's unusual in a young female child.<br /><br />These are some of the things that stick out as just not being right.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-67467574967988700782016-09-06T22:47:52.856-04:002016-09-06T22:47:52.856-04:00Sorry I never saw the show. Don't have cable. ...Sorry I never saw the show. Don't have cable. But if it was produced by Mills, the conclusion doesn't surprise me. Smit's take on the case was deeply flawed, as both Steve Thomas and James Kolar recognized. Yes, he was able to go through that window, but no one could have done that without leaving clear signs of his presence on the window sill -- and none were found. Yes there was a remote possibility of a stun gun. But those marks could have been put there by any number of things. He manufactured that stun gun out of thin air. Along with a lot of other nonsense, producing a long list of red herrings.DocGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17359004200002936544noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-3215489976011759222016-09-06T21:21:51.199-04:002016-09-06T21:21:51.199-04:00Having gone full circle at least a couple of times...Having gone full circle at least a couple of times, I'm now back to Burke Did It. Minnesota LindaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-72117971407664767242016-09-06T21:20:01.155-04:002016-09-06T21:20:01.155-04:00Well, you learn something every day! I honestly ha...Well, you learn something every day! I honestly have never heard of that. I must not get out enough. Thanks for the sex-ed refresher. ;) Minnesota LindaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-84141688510920339042016-09-06T20:56:40.685-04:002016-09-06T20:56:40.685-04:00Yes there are people who like being choked during ...Yes there are people who like being choked during sex Linda, however in this case the asphyxiation that some have speculated was done to JB is for the pleasure of the person doing the strangling, obviously. In this scenario what is being referred to is, the choking of the victim while the assaulter "gets off" on the assaulted party as the stra gulation supposedly mimics an orgasm to the assaulting party<br /> I would draw you pictures on here to help you better understand if I could. LOL Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-54536300307888640362016-09-06T20:23:16.400-04:002016-09-06T20:23:16.400-04:00I always thought it was for the benefit of the per...I always thought it was for the benefit of the person being choked. Isn't that what happened to David Carradine, who supposedly died while attempting Autoerotic Asphyxiation? He was all alone at the time. Minnesota LindaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-56188792619835773402016-09-06T19:49:42.495-04:002016-09-06T19:49:42.495-04:00No Linda you said the point of it was for the pers...No Linda you said the point of it was for the person being strangled to have arousal. The strangler is the 1 doing this for their arousal as it mimics orgasm .Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-74730697012519392832016-09-06T18:04:40.686-04:002016-09-06T18:04:40.686-04:00This show on A&E was produced by David Mills P...This show on A&E was produced by David Mills Productions, the coordinator with Michael Tracey of the initial JonBenet shows. David Mills was a huge proponent of the innocence of the Rs. Those shows were the ‘crowd warm-up’ for John Mark Karr. If you’ll note, many of the interviewees were British. They were given just enough information to get the story wrong; same, I’m sure, with Lawrence Kobilinsky of the John Jay School of Criminal Justice. <br /><br />Another item one might observe is that the producers sought out folks in Smit’s neighborhood of Colorado Springs like the local pathologist who gave an opinion about the sexual abuse. He claimed vaginitis caused her internal injuries, never mind her hymen was pretty much completely eroded. It was all created to cast doubt on the R family involvement in JonBenet’s homicide. The only person I believed in this recent 'crock' was Detective Patterson.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-21026009156544200822016-09-06T10:21:19.810-04:002016-09-06T10:21:19.810-04:00It seems like the A&E show was also going with...It seems like the A&E show was also going with the expert that didn't think there was prior molestation. Or did I miss the correction?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-87903619194018174642016-09-06T10:01:49.382-04:002016-09-06T10:01:49.382-04:00Lou Smit found lots of things that weren't the...Lou Smit found lots of things that weren't there or that he got wrong. The A&E show, as I understand it, reflects his take on this case, which was debunked a long time ago. The producers should have done some due diligence before regurgitating nonsense.DocGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17359004200002936544noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-15527396667015916552016-09-06T02:55:59.873-04:002016-09-06T02:55:59.873-04:00Autoerotic Asphyxiation is what I was referring to...Autoerotic Asphyxiation is what I was referring to.<br />Minnesota LindaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-80115917070096222752016-09-06T02:52:00.266-04:002016-09-06T02:52:00.266-04:00Which is basically what I said in my comment, righ...Which is basically what I said in my comment, right?<br />Minnesota LindaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-34431423072745536052016-09-06T02:26:22.347-04:002016-09-06T02:26:22.347-04:00The nail marks on Jonbenets neck are neck are not ...The nail marks on Jonbenets neck are neck are not new evidence, Lou Smit found those way back in 97. ~J~Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-55482434429290456532016-09-06T01:34:52.576-04:002016-09-06T01:34:52.576-04:00No Linda it is not. I am no expert but from what I...No Linda it is not. I am no expert but from what I have read it is meant for the person being strangled to mimic them having an orgasm.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-18615279601245781812016-09-06T01:27:37.958-04:002016-09-06T01:27:37.958-04:00Well there has always been a dispute about which c...Well there has always been a dispute about which came first. Cyril was always very adamant and sure the strangulation came first. All I can say is that 20 yrs later forensics are much better and more advanced just as experts are probably more experienced and technologically advanced as well. I personally did not come up with this change of evidence. My understanding, (and I may be mistaken, I am no expert), is that an unconscious person would not have any petechial hemorraging around the eyes. Like I said though take a look for yourself. I would venture to say that there could possibly be more surprises coming soon. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-27703505218402692562016-09-06T01:14:40.448-04:002016-09-06T01:14:40.448-04:00The medical examiner saw them up close and did not...The medical examiner saw them up close and did not report scratches or, if you prefer, nail marks. The link you provided is no help either. All the experts agree that strangulation was the cause of death, so yes she was alive when strangled, which produced the homorrhages around her eyes. But all the evidence points to the head blow preceding the strangulation. And the blood evidence was taken into consideration by these experts and they were able to explain it. I'm not an expert, so all I can do is report what the medical examiner and the others said. Wecht was one of the few who felt the strangulation came first, but that's because he saw it as erotic strangulation (by John). I have great respect for Wecht, but the cord was deeply embedded in her neck. Nothing erotic about that.DocGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17359004200002936544noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-86838223160700531722016-09-06T00:56:35.728-04:002016-09-06T00:56:35.728-04:00I am no expert on what wording of an autopsy would...I am no expert on what wording of an autopsy would be but abrasion =nail mark ? I dont know. Take a look for yourself though. Those are without a doubt nail marks. I wouldnt really call them scratches. Petechial Hemorrhages around the eyes are consistent with someone conscious and awake while being strangled. http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3448300444.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-51011181006511601672016-09-06T00:42:47.324-04:002016-09-06T00:42:47.324-04:00No, petechial hemorrhages have nothing to do with ...No, petechial hemorrhages have nothing to do with the struggles of the victim. If she'd been conscious she'd probably have been scratching at her neck, but that's not what was reported. DocGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17359004200002936544noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-34868724341587567712016-09-06T00:40:35.774-04:002016-09-06T00:40:35.774-04:00According to the autopsy, "The skin of the an...According to the autopsy, "The skin of the anterior neck above and below the ligature furrow contains areas of petechial hemorrhage and abrasion . . . "<br /><br />No mention of scratches anywhere on her neck.DocGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17359004200002936544noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-65810961698489628692016-09-06T00:38:41.223-04:002016-09-06T00:38:41.223-04:00The autopsy says abrasions and petechial hemorrage...The autopsy says abrasions and petechial hemorrages around the neck. It also says petechial hemorrages around the eyes, which would be consistent with someoneone with someone conscious and fighting while being strangled.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-32715831196795855362016-09-06T00:30:33.291-04:002016-09-06T00:30:33.291-04:00"Perhaps she was fighting the perpetrator whi..."Perhaps she was fighting the perpetrator while being strangled," That's a possibility, I suppose. But according to most of the medical experts there was period of at least 45 minutes between the head blow and the strangulation. Of course not all of them agree.DocGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17359004200002936544noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-69655115137338684992016-09-06T00:29:12.330-04:002016-09-06T00:29:12.330-04:00Coincidentally, this particular set of flesh wound...Coincidentally, this particular set of flesh wounds are right in the front of JB's neck. Exactly where you would expect someone who was being strangled to be clawing at the ligature. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com