tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post360919869165396324..comments2024-02-23T18:09:21.379-05:00Comments on Solving the JonBenet Ramsey Case: The Complaint -- Part 6DocGhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17359004200002936544noreply@blogger.comBlogger257125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-26885081197322274062017-01-30T21:20:20.486-05:002017-01-30T21:20:20.486-05:00It was absolutely sourced to John's unusual Is...It was absolutely sourced to John's unusual Israeli-made shirt, and it was found in her brand new, fresh out of the package panties. No PR fibers in panties, no JR fibers on duct tape. It's a draw, KS - either they're all significant or, because they lived in a shared home, none are. <br />CCAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-54560007564904873622017-01-30T12:13:35.620-05:002017-01-30T12:13:35.620-05:00The RN leads everybody everywhere except one to s...The RN leads everybody everywhere except one to suspect:PR<br /><br />The only thing that connect is that she might have wrote it... <br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00262149282861518060noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-16488546365139421202017-01-26T20:55:34.952-05:002017-01-26T20:55:34.952-05:00Ha, its from September of 98. Im still gonna read ...Ha, its from September of 98. Im still gonna read it though. It seems written a bit differently than the others. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04737786478506148483noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-30681301313543170222017-01-26T19:21:49.869-05:002017-01-26T19:21:49.869-05:00Anon: You should confirm your sources before posti...Anon: You should confirm your sources before posting. Most people on this blog site are well-schooled on this case.<br /><br />As for why the police stopped focusing on John, the answer is the very cornerstone of Doc's theory; he was first to be "ruled out" as the writer of the ransom note. <br /><br />Mike GAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-18478233027789121582017-01-26T17:52:51.072-05:002017-01-26T17:52:51.072-05:00CC , That fiber was NEVER sourced to JR. However, ...CC , That fiber was NEVER sourced to JR. However, even if it was my argument here is not about 1 single fiber, it is the totallity of the fibers. As if everything JR touches, he leaves a fiber from PR but none of his ? Where is the logic in that ? There is no logic in it. The gist of this is that I am surely not denying JR being on that crime scene, only that at some point, PR obviously was as well.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04737786478506148483noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-75362989877009725112017-01-26T17:46:49.257-05:002017-01-26T17:46:49.257-05:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04737786478506148483noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-58980669633471922102017-01-26T14:34:06.889-05:002017-01-26T14:34:06.889-05:00If that's so, then explain the fiber from John...If that's so, then explain the fiber from John's Israeli-made shirt in her panties, KS.<br />CCAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-17243636917741598252017-01-26T14:25:16.249-05:002017-01-26T14:25:16.249-05:00I looked and it appears to talk about how sensitiv...I looked and it appears to talk about how sensitive touch DNA is and could have been anyone. The problem I have with this is I would think John's touch DNA would be all over here if he was molesting/abusing he. <br /><br />Bravo Gumshoe! Exactly. Also the fiber evidence as well. Sure it could be transference from JR but then where are JR's fibers since he was in so much contact with her ? Surely he could not have transferred fibers onto every place it was found. The same applies for the DNA. Is it possible ? Sure, anything is. Is it likely is the question<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04737786478506148483noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-78366487439855274142017-01-26T11:42:37.905-05:002017-01-26T11:42:37.905-05:00Not if he used gloves or wiped her off after the a...Not if he used gloves or wiped her off after the act. Maybe that's what the digital penetration was all about. Using a finger to clean her up. ( internally). sorry am not feeling comfortable explainingAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-18405679602458368762017-01-26T11:34:10.432-05:002017-01-26T11:34:10.432-05:00Wouldn't John's DNA be in her vagina if he...Wouldn't John's DNA be in her vagina if he sexually abused her?Gumshoehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01547143220583770679noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-74780385299589516262017-01-26T11:31:47.163-05:002017-01-26T11:31:47.163-05:00Their touch Dna should be on her clothes since the...Their touch Dna should be on her clothes since they put her to bed and John carried her up from rhe basement. Their dna on her proves nothing. The absence of it does though.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-18978631175177907612017-01-26T10:52:32.315-05:002017-01-26T10:52:32.315-05:00So can someone answer my question; if John was res...So can someone answer my question; if John was responsible for this, why wouldn't his DNA (touch or otherwise) be all over JBR?Gumshoehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01547143220583770679noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-81025191317699790042017-01-26T10:49:24.102-05:002017-01-26T10:49:24.102-05:00damn typos, sorrydamn typos, sorryAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-68021052841153666842017-01-26T10:48:02.663-05:002017-01-26T10:48:02.663-05:00IIRC JR claims on TOSOS that he got an anonymous c...IIRC JR claims on TOSOS that he got an anonymous call warning hom the police are after them. Bynuma claims in the AE doc ( the one prior to dr phil) that HE got a call from someone in LE warning him the Ramseys need a lawyer. Abuse is mentioned somewhere else but I can not find it. Maybe it wad JR on dr. phil.on another show. Will look.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-85323964303709334542017-01-26T09:12:41.663-05:002017-01-26T09:12:41.663-05:00Anon is correct, everything I have read is that th...Anon is correct, everything I have read is that the palm print was ID'd as being John's older daughter.diamondlilnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-28564968731821559622017-01-26T09:04:41.008-05:002017-01-26T09:04:41.008-05:00Yes, have considered this Doc. If the note was us...Yes, have considered this Doc. If the note was used to send the direction of an investigation outside the house then that purpose would not necessarily have been to buy time - buy time for what. No, it would have been to take suspicion out of the house of the Ramsey family and to an intruder. That's what I thought J was saying. And not just the note, but hiding the body, which since it wasn't seen, then the note would have at least for a while, be believed. Of course just how long could that idea was to be believed - the killer didn't think very far ahead but again that's consistent to me with improvisation and doing what is thought to work in the moment. That works for PDI, Jatsy, or a combination of B, J and P, but not for JDI.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03980400715237199782noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-78307309881746431532017-01-26T09:00:22.781-05:002017-01-26T09:00:22.781-05:00Thanks Ms. D, for your very sensible response to t...Thanks Ms. D, for your very sensible response to that bogus "statement analysis."<br /><br />Actually there is a real science of statement analysis. It seems that certain types of statements are more characteristic of people who are lying than people who are telling the truth, and that's been backed up by statistical research. So for example, a certain type of response during a 911 call might be found to be characteristic of known liars say 75% of the time. And this could be very useful for profilers during the early stages of an investigation to help investigators focus on certain likely suspects.<br /><br />But if that same type of statement has been found among 75% of liars, that means that it has also been found among 25% of people known to have been telling the truth. Which means that you cannot say for sure, on the basis of even the most scientific statement analysis, whether any given person is actually lying at any given time. All it can do is give you a clue as to how likely it is that someone COULD be lying.<br /><br />So if you wanted to claim, on the basis of the 911 call, that some of Patsy's statements sound suspicious, that would be reasonable. Though it would be necessary to reference the particular study that provided the evidence to back up such a claim.<br /><br />But to claim, as this person does, that a statement of that sort is proof positive of guilt, no, that is NOT warranted and is in fact an outrageous assumption, with no scientific basis whatsoever.DocGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17359004200002936544noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-48072691679686839982017-01-26T09:00:16.873-05:002017-01-26T09:00:16.873-05:00The question was why did they lawyer up. And this ...The question was why did they lawyer up. And this was the answer. That someone in LE called them and told them policr were focusing on John.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-19417120030577318272017-01-26T08:57:16.182-05:002017-01-26T08:57:16.182-05:00Bynum in one of the IDI shows prior to dr. Phil I ...Bynum in one of the IDI shows prior to dr. Phil I think but I am not sure. Maybe someone else recalls? Him or John. I don't recall but I am sure this is what was said cause I thought geez another version of the story re who tipped them off.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-81568067573849780972017-01-26T08:49:24.178-05:002017-01-26T08:49:24.178-05:00better yet Keiser, if it's a new one I'll ...better yet Keiser, if it's a new one I'll run down and get it. What is the copyright date?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03980400715237199782noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-76860399889126792032017-01-26T08:44:45.616-05:002017-01-26T08:44:45.616-05:00I looked and it appears to talk about how sensitiv...I looked and it appears to talk about how sensitive touch DNA is and could have been anyone. The problem I have with this is I would think John's touch DNA would be all over here if he was molesting/abusing her.Gumshoehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01547143220583770679noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-86121790205345677262017-01-26T08:35:25.522-05:002017-01-26T08:35:25.522-05:00You still haven't answered my question, Keiser...You still haven't answered my question, Keiser. Which is it: "Help me Jesus" or "What did you do?"DocGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17359004200002936544noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-78365309948948808682017-01-26T08:26:11.335-05:002017-01-26T08:26:11.335-05:00I missed that. Which show was it?
CCI missed that. Which show was it?<br />CCAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-63151483998952730452017-01-26T08:07:32.573-05:002017-01-26T08:07:32.573-05:00Someone mentioned the prior abuse OUT LOUD? That&...Someone mentioned the prior abuse OUT LOUD? That's a first. I missed it. Which program was it? <br />CCAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6494242281396312957.post-90968716713213817892017-01-26T07:34:59.873-05:002017-01-26T07:34:59.873-05:00DOC,
It was either Bynum or John in one of the la...DOC,<br /><br />It was either Bynum or John in one of the latest shows who said they got this call from their source in LE and they were told police is focusing on John and the sexual abuse.<br /><br />Is it a lie or if true why on earth did police just walk away from the most logical theory?? They just stopped out of the blue. Nobody focused on John. They gave him a pass based on what exactly??<br /><br />You have a female victim and sexual abuse and you focus on the mother and now on the other child?wtfAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com